[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 12:26:18PM +0100, Sam Clegg wrote:
> > "
> > In principal, we also do not object to have Perforce binaries included
> > in the non-free part of the debian distribution, as long as it is clear
> > that you are the sole distributor and maintainer of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 9/20/07, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks for this courtesy. A request: when posting paragraphs of text,
> > please make sure the lines wrap properly (which, in practice, also
> > implies "don't use gmail").
>
> I'll attach it as a text file next time
On 9/20/07, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > The standard Perforce commercial EULA, from
> > http://www.perforce.com/perforce/contracts/commercial.pdf
>
> Thanks for this courtesy. A request: when posting paragraphs of text,
> please make sure the lines wrap p
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The standard Perforce commercial EULA, from
> http://www.perforce.com/perforce/contracts/commercial.pdf
Thanks for this courtesy. A request: when posting paragraphs of text,
please make sure the lines wrap properly (which, in practice, also
implies "don't use gmail").
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 12:26:18PM +0100, Sam Clegg wrote:
> "
> In principal, we also do not object to have Perforce binaries included
> in the non-free part of the debian distribution, as long as it is clear
> that you are the sole distributor and maintainer of the packages and
> Perforce is in n
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 12:26:18PM +0100, Sam Clegg wrote:
> "
> In principal, we also do not object to have Perforce binaries included
> in the non-free part of the debian distribution, as long as it is clear
> that you are the sole distributor and maintainer of the packages and
> Perforce is in n
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 09:12 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
> that has been posted to gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal as well.
>
> Sam Clegg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I maintain debain packages of perforce client and server for use
> > with
Sam Clegg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I maintain debain packages of perforce client and server for use
> within my company. I was wondering if these packages would be
> candidates for inclusion in non-free. [...]
> AFAICT the binaries are freely distributable:
Can you please post the exact te
hello all,
I maintain debain packages of perforce client and server for use within
my company. I was wondering if these packages would be candidates for
inclusion in non-free. I've contacted perforce and they seem to
be happy for this to happen:
"
We would definitely like to see the packages
9 matches
Mail list logo
