Re: public domain no modification: Expat

2012-04-13 Thread Francesco Poli
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:05:56 +0200 Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > FYI, upstream agreed to change the pseudo public domain license into > an MIT one (expat): > > http://math.hws.edu/javamath/ This seems to be great news! :-) I hope the new license (Expat/MIT) applies to all the files in the packag

Re: public domain no modification: Expat

2012-04-13 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
FYI, upstream agreed to change the pseudo public domain license into an MIT one (expat): http://math.hws.edu/javamath/ Thanks everyone for comments/suggestions. On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Mon, 9 Apr 2012 15:10:26 -0700 Steve Langasek wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 10,

Re: public domain no modification

2012-04-10 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 9 Apr 2012 15:10:26 -0700 Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:01:45AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > That's not my understanding of the issue under consideration: more > > details are included in my own analysis [1]. > > Yes, because as usual your analysis is way ou

Re: public domain no modification

2012-04-09 Thread Walter Landry
Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:01:45AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: >> > On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 05:05:27PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > >> > > Clearly §2 is meant to distinguish derived work from original work. >> > > However in our case, this means this package will hav

Re: public domain no modification

2012-04-09 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:01:45AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 05:05:27PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > > Clearly §2 is meant to distinguish derived work from original work. > > > However in our case, this means this package will have to have its > > > name chang

Re: public domain no modification

2012-04-09 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 9 Apr 2012 11:29:31 -0700 Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 05:05:27PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: [...] > > Clearly §2 is meant to distinguish derived work from original work. > > However in our case, this means this package will have to have its > > name change whenever

Re: public domain no modification

2012-04-09 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 05:05:27PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > I am working on the package for "Java Components for Mathematics" > (#667923). Some files are distributed with a clear public domain type > license: > This source code file, and compiled classes derived from it, can > be used

Re: public domain no modification

2012-04-07 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sat, 7 Apr 2012 17:05:27 +0200 Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Hi all, Hi Mathieu, thanks for taking this issue seriously. > > I am working on the package for "Java Components for Mathematics" > (#667923). Some files are distributed with a clear public domain type > license: > > This source c

public domain no modification

2012-04-07 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Hi all, I am working on the package for "Java Components for Mathematics" (#667923). Some files are distributed with a clear public domain type license: This source code file, and compiled classes derived from it, can be used and distributed without restriction, including for commercial use.