Hi,
QLogic just emailed me the wording of their new license for qla2xxx
firmware. Please let me know if anyone sees problems with this.
Copyright (C) 2003 –2005 QLogic Corporation [QLA2x00]
This program includes a device driver for Linux 2.6.x that is distributed
with QLogic hardware specific
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 15:13:47 -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> QLogic just emailed me the wording of their new license for qla2xxx
> firmware. Please let me know if anyone sees problems with this.
>
>
> Copyright (C) 2003 –2005 QLogic Corporation [QLA2x00]
>
> This program includes a de
Andres Salomon wrote:
> > USER ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT USE OF THIS PROGRAM WILL NOT
> > CREATE OR GIVE GROUNDS FOR A LICENSE BY IMPLICATION, ESTOPPEL, OR
> > OTHERWISE IN ANY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (PATENT, COPYRIGHT,
> > TRADE SECRET, MASK WORK, OR OTHER PROPRIETARY RIGH
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 15:13:47 -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > USER ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT USE OF THIS PROGRAM WILL NOT
> > CREATE OR GIVE GROUNDS FOR A LICENSE BY IMPLICATION, ESTOPPEL,
> > OR OTHERWISE IN ANY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGH
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 15:13:47 -0400 Andres Salomon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> QLogic just emailed me the wording of their new license for qla2xxx
> firmware.
Good, thanks for dealing with this issue! :)
> Please let me know if anyone sees problems with this.
>
>
> Copyright (C) 2003 â2005 QLogic Cor
On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 01:59:25 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 15:13:47 -0400 Andres Salomon wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> QLogic just emailed me the wording of their new license for qla2xxx
>> firmware.
>
> Good, thanks for dealing with this issue! :)
>
>> Please let me know if anyo
On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 12:01:14 -0400 Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 01:59:25 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > First of all, it's the "GNU General Public License", otherwise
> > they're referring to a non-existent license... ;-)
> >
>
> Yea, someone else caught that as well; I e
On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 01:11:46 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 12:01:14 -0400 Andres Salomon wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 01:59:25 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
>>
>> The reason for the dual licensing is because they have OEMs that would
>> need to re-qualify (that may b
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 16:50:53 +0300 Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 01:11:46 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 12:01:14 -0400 Andres Salomon wrote:
[...]
> > > So, by
> > > dual-licensing, the OEMs can continue using the driver and
> > > firmware under the GPL (inv
9 matches
Mail list logo