Glenn Maynard writes:
I've split this off, since I don't think mixing the LaTeX and (Te)TeX
licensing problems is a good idea.
they are related but you are right this is a separate issue and should be
discussed separately.
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 04:27:57PM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
Frank Mittelbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as far as TeX is concerned I tried to put up references to what could be
called a license and copyright notices in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200207/msg00321.html
and Walter is wrong, it concerns file names and
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 07:00:39PM +0200, Frank Mittelbach wrote:
listing them, would be a nice try but hopeless as you would need to keep track
of i would guess more than 1000 individual works that end up in tetex texmf
trees. That would not be automatable and as a manual process it would be
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 08:27:31PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
Is anybody investigating this?
I filed bug#153257 about this. I don't know if anyone is investigating it :)
Frankly, I thought tetex licensing had been discussed and resolved a long
time ago, and I'm surprised that there's still a
4 matches
Mail list logo
