Re: zlib license

2003-10-15 Thread Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo
> > Note that another way to tell that the software is probably DFSG-free is > to: > (a) Note the changelog entry says "Switched to zlib license." > (b) zlib1g is a package in Debian main licensed under the zlib licence > (that's how the licence got its name). &g

Re: zlib license

2003-10-13 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 09:47:11PM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: > It's very short license. It could be reached at: > http://cvs.icculus.org/horde/chora/co.php/LICENSE?rt=physfs&r=1.2 Just for grins, here's the text: This software is provided 'as-is', without any express or implied war

Re: zlib license

2003-10-12 Thread Nathanael Nerode
>It's very short license. It could be reached at: >http://cvs.icculus.org/horde/chora/co.php/LICENSE?rt=physfs&r=1.2 This is certainly DFSG-free; it's the same as the license for zlib. (See the zlib1g package in Debian.)

Re: zlib license

2003-10-12 Thread Adam Warner
amp;r=1.2 This is clearly a DFSG-free software licence (and a very permissive one). Note that another way to tell that the software is probably DFSG-free is to: (a) Note the changelog entry says "Switched to zlib license." (b) zlib1g is a package in Debian main licensed under the zl

Re: zlib license

2003-10-12 Thread Simon Law
too but this software has got non-popular license. > I think it complains DFSG but I'd like to ensure. > Could someone read it and tell me if I am right? > > It's very short license. It could be reached at: > http://cvs.icculus.org/horde/chora/co.php/LICENSE?rt=physfs&

zlib license

2003-10-12 Thread Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo
Hello. I've been thinking about packaging netPantzer (strategy game) but it depends on PhysicsFS which is absent in Debian archive (http://www.icculus.org/physfs/). So I'd like to package it too but this software has got non-popular license. I think it complains DFSG but I'd like to ensure. Co