The ZWiki project (a wiki engine for the Zope framework, package
zope-zwiki in debian main) contains a copyright statement on files:
(c) 1999-2003 Simon Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for the zwiki
community.
The project is GPL2, however the maintainer (Simon Michael) desires that
he own the
(Cc'ed to OP since I am not sure whether he subscribes to -legal.)
Bob McElrath writes:
> 1. Does the above constitute a valid copyright transfer? Given the
> above, what is the copyright status of this project? Are the copyrights
> still held by individual contributors or are they (in your leg
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 12:11:18PM -0800, Bob McElrath wrote:
> 1. Does the above constitute a valid copyright transfer? Given the
> above, what is the copyright status of this project? Are the copyrights
> still held by individual contributors or are they (in your legal
> opinion) actually held
Please drop [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the CC list; it's not an appropriate
address to be CCing list discussions.
Note that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is bouncing ("User unknown").
--
Glenn Maynard
Glenn Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please drop [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the CC list; it's not an appropriate
> address to be CCing list discussions.
>
> Note that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is bouncing ("User unknown").
I made a note of this on the page from which I obtained that email
address...
--
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bob McElrath
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Our questions are these:
1. Does the above constitute a valid copyright transfer? Given the
above, what is the copyright status of this project? Are the copyrights
still held by individual contributors or are they (in you
Thanks for this thread. That's pretty much what I figured. My (vague)
assumption was that by getting at least verbal agreement, I would have a
good chance of getting written agreement later if a need arose.
Now I've got a situation where a contributor does not agree to assign
copyright, and I'
Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bob McElrath
An email which clearly says "I assign my copyright in this patch ..." is
probably good enough, provided it's signed so you can prove it's not
forged.
http://profs.lp.findlaw.com/signatures/signature_4.html is interestin
Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
> >In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bob McElrath
>
> >An email which clearly says "I assign my copyright in this patch ..." is
> >probably good enough, provided it's signed so you can prove it's not
> >forged.
>
> http://profs.lp.findlaw.co
Arnoud Engelfriet wrote:
See
http://europa.eu.int/ISPO/legal/en/ecommerce/digsig.html
I think you meant:
http://europa.eu.int/ISPO/legal/en/ecommerc/digsig.html
Unfortunately, the link to the directive on that page is 404 compliant.
Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> I think you meant:
>
> http://europa.eu.int/ISPO/legal/en/ecommerc/digsig.html
>
> Unfortunately, the link to the directive on that page is 404 compliant.
Thank you. It's a pity the EU shuffles its pages around so much.
There is a copy of the Directive at
http://europ
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 03:35:42PM -0500, FSF Licensing Questions via RT wrote:
> There is no need to reply to this message right now. Your request has
> been assigned an ID of [gnu.org #214407].
Please disregard this. An over-zealous list poster included [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in
the CC list.
--
12 matches
Mail list logo
