Processed: severity of 499847 is minor

2008-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 499847 minor Bug#499847: lintian: command-with-path false positives with 'case' construct Severity set to `minor' from `normal' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Re: [RFC/PATCH] New Lintian::Output module

2008-09-22 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 06:40:15PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Jordà Polo wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 12:51:44PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > >> Btw, why would it be any useful to print them until the whole package is > >> processed? I would find printing them after every check scri

Re: [RFC/PATCH] New Lintian::Output module

2008-09-22 Thread Raphael Geissert
Jordà Polo wrote: > On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 12:51:44PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: >> Btw, why would it be any useful to print them until the whole package is >> processed? I would find printing them after every check script is run >> better. > > The current lintian output is thought to be hum

Bug#499847: lintian: command-with-path false positives with 'case' construct

2008-09-22 Thread Julien Cristau
Package: lintian Version: 2.0.0~rc2 Severity: normal Hi lintian maintainers, See http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-xorg/xsfbs.git;a=blob;f=debian/xsfbs/xsfbs.sh;h=72efa950d3276968f8405e8fecc32ea5a4572e77;hb=HEAD#l213 The following construct: case $foo in /usr/bin/bar) baz ;;

Re: On dropping 'Type'

2008-09-22 Thread Russ Allbery
Jordà Polo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 07:44:23PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: >> Now that the EWI code is generated via %codes, why is Type still around >> then? > There is probably no reason to keep it, but it doesn't really hurt > either. Some may still find it usef

Re: On dropping 'Type'

2008-09-22 Thread Jordà Polo
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 07:44:23PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Now that the EWI code is generated via %codes, why is Type still around > then? There is probably no reason to keep it, but it doesn't really hurt either. Some may still find it useful as a reference, and to easily compare to the

Re: [RFC/PATCH] New Lintian::Output module

2008-09-22 Thread Jordà Polo
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 12:51:44PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Btw, why would it be any useful to print them until the whole package is > processed? I would find printing them after every check script is run > better. The current lintian output is thought to be human-readable _and_ machine-pa