Re: Couple of patches

2009-02-10 Thread Raphael Geissert
Russ Allbery wrote: > Raphael Geissert writes: >> Russ Allbery wrote: [...] >> I remember seeing the other day some unneeded files being generated at >> unpack level 1 of binary packages. > > More detail would be good. The only things that level 1 unpack of binary > packages generates are the co

Bug#514697: marked as done ([lib/Lintian/Collect/Binary.pm] missing "use Lintian::Colection")

2009-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:32:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#514697: fixed in lintian 2.2.5 has caused the Debian Bug report #514697, regarding [lib/Lintian/Collect/Binary.pm] missing "use Lintian::Colection" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

lintian_2.2.5_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2009-02-10 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: lintian_2.2.5.dsc to pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_2.2.5.dsc lintian_2.2.5.tar.gz to pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_2.2.5.tar.gz lintian_2.2.5_all.deb to pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_2.2.5_all.deb Override entries for your package: lintian_2.2.5.dsc - source devel lintian_2.2.5_all.deb

Processing of lintian_2.2.5_amd64.changes

2009-02-10 Thread Archive Administrator
lintian_2.2.5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lintian_2.2.5.dsc lintian_2.2.5.tar.gz lintian_2.2.5_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscr

[SCM] Debian package checker annotated tag, 2.2.5, created. 2.2.5

2009-02-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
The annotated tag, 2.2.5 has been created at 02d49ff3c94965be38bef299e8e83cef362d85f8 (tag) tagging d2842e066cfd2d0f436d908774492e38eaf5633e (commit) replaces 2.2.4 tagged by Adam D. Barratt on Tue Feb 10 23:17:19 2009 + - Shortlog ---

[SCM] Debian package checker branch, master, updated. 2.2.4-2-gd2842e0

2009-02-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit d2842e066cfd2d0f436d908774492e38eaf5633e Author: Adam D. Barratt Date: Tue Feb 10 23:15:59 2009 + Finalize changes for 2.2.5 diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 064b75a..6884b49 100644 --- a/debian/cha

Re: Bug#514697: [lib/Lintian/Collect/Binary.pm] missing "use Lintian::Colection"

2009-02-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 12:52 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > "Adam D. Barratt" writes: > > Ugh. Thanks, fixed (together with the corresponding problem in > > Collect/Source.pm). > > Yes, thank you -- probably time for another upload. :/ I can sort that out in an hour or so, unless there were any o

Window Insulators (Interior Mounted - Energy Efficient) - TRANE strategic supplier

2009-02-10 Thread Keith Roberts
Window Insulators (Interior Mounted - Energy Efficient) - TRANE strategic supplier Our interior window insulators impressed Trane Air-Conditioning so much after a two month extensive study that we are a strategic supplier for them now! Our product reduces cold air infiltration up to 71%, stops

Bug#514697: [lib/Lintian/Collect/Binary.pm] missing "use Lintian::Colection"

2009-02-10 Thread Russ Allbery
"Adam D. Barratt" writes: > On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 02:00 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: >> Can't locate object method "new" via package "Lintian::Relation" (perhaps >> you >> forgot to load "Lintian::Relation"?) >> at /home/raphael/Deb/lintian/lib/Lintian/Collect/Binary.pm line 285. >> internal

Processed: setting package to lintian, tagging 514697

2009-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > #lintian (2.2.5) UNRELEASED; urgency=low > # > # * lib/Lintian/Collect/{Binary,Source}.pm: > #+ [ADB] Add a missing "use Lintian::Relation". Thanks, Raphael Geissert. > # (Closes: #514697) > # > package lintian Ignoring bugs not assigne

Bug#514697: [lib/Lintian/Collect/Binary.pm] missing "use Lintian::Colection"

2009-02-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 02:00 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Can't locate object method "new" via package "Lintian::Relation" (perhaps you > forgot to load "Lintian::Relation"?) > at /home/raphael/Deb/lintian/lib/Lintian/Collect/Binary.pm line 285. > internal error: cannot run copyright_file chec

[SCM] Debian package checker branch, master, updated. 2.2.4-1-g0b84df5

2009-02-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 0b84df503c6719cc6c222ccf7b7c1ef3090d6161 Author: Adam D. Barratt Date: Tue Feb 10 08:22:24 2009 + Add missing "use Lintian::Relation"s * lib/Lintian/Collect/{Binary,Source}.pm: + [ADB] Add a missing "use Li

Bug#514697: [lib/Lintian/Collect/Binary.pm] missing "use Lintian::Colection"

2009-02-10 Thread Raphael Geissert
Package: lintian Version: 2.2.4 Severity: important Tags: patch Hi all, Again bad news: Can't locate object method "new" via package "Lintian::Relation" (perhaps you forgot to load "Lintian::Relation"?) at /home/raphael/Deb/lintian/lib/Lintian/Collect/Binary.pm line 285. internal error: cannot