Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> severity 517191 wishlist
>
> Sorry, my fault. Of course shall be GPL-2 instead of GPL2.
> Then, maybe a check for referring to non-existent licene file?
I though I had already submitted a patch for this, but can't find it neither
in the mailing list nor in the BTS, s
"Nelson A. de Oliveira" writes:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> No, that example should definitely not use
>> /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL. It is currently correct and changing
>> it in that way would be incorrect, since /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL
>> is GPL v3.
Hi!
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> "Nelson A. de Oliveira" writes:
>> The Debian packaging is licensed under the GPL-2 or any later version,
>> see `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2'
>>
>> If possible, it should warn that the it should use
>> /usr/share/common-licenses/
"Nelson A. de Oliveira" writes:
> The copyright part is:
>
> ==
> The Debian packaging is (c) 2009, William Pitcock
> and is licensed under the GPL, see `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL'.
> ==
>
> So if there is a "licensed under the GLP", without any versions, it
> should consider that i
"Nelson A. de Oliveira" writes:
> And this one was not caught:
>
> Files: debian/*
> Copyright: 2008, Foo Bar
> License: GPL-2+
> The Debian packaging is licensed under the GPL-2 or any later version,
> see `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2'
>
> If possible, it should warn that the it should u
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit bc2927f2c71e23502ee1e936cdfe17aa3d1dd055
Author: Adam D. Barratt
Date: Thu Feb 26 21:07:43 2009 +
Readd comment inadvertantly removed in
ff4200803d6ff1211640327968531ffc4fd7966b
diff --git a/checks/shared-libs b/checks/
abrogate corpocracies procurer quuietest
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit ff4200803d6ff1211640327968531ffc4fd7966b
Author: Adam D. Barratt
Date: Thu Feb 26 20:50:52 2009 +
Handle ORed depencies in symbols files.
Extend the parsing of dependency templates in symbols files to handle
Hi again!
And this one was not caught:
Files: debian/*
Copyright: 2008, Foo Bar
License: GPL-2+
The Debian packaging is licensed under the GPL-2 or any later version,
see `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2'
If possible, it should warn that the it should use
/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL
Than
Hi!
Here is a warning that I am having on one package that I am using lintian:
W: libdownload1: copyright-refers-to-versionless-license-file
usr/share/common-licenses/GPL
N:
N:The copyright file refers to the versionless symlink in
N:/usr/share/common-licenses for the full text of the G
severity 517191 wishlist
Sorry, my fault. Of course shall be GPL-2 instead of GPL2.
Then, maybe a check for referring to non-existent licene file?
Regards
Artur
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact lis
Package: lintian
Version: 2.2.5
Severity: normal
Hello,
Lintian reports for libqglviewer:
W: libqglviewer-qt4-2: copyright-refers-to-versionless-license-file
usr/share/common-licenses/GPL
W: libqglviewer-qt3-2: copyright-refers-to-versionless-license-file
usr/share/common-licenses/GPL
W: libqgl
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 517191 wishlist
Bug#517191: false positive about copyright-refers-to-versionless-license-file
usr/share/common-licenses/GPL
Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal'
> Sorry, my fault. Of course shall be GPL-2 instead of GPL2.
Unknown co
13 matches
Mail list logo
