Jeffrey Ratcliffe writes:
> Package: lintian
> Version: 2.2.5
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Lintian could check that .la files are in the -dev, package and not
> incorrectly in the binary package.
It should complain about any la file period. :)
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
Package: lintian
Version: 2.2.5
Severity: wishlist
Lintian could check that .la files are in the -dev, package and not
incorrectly in the binary package.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.de
Package: lintian
Version: 2.2.5
Severity: wishlist
The dependency of libfoo-dev should be versioned on libfooX. The
symbolic link /usr/lib/libfoo.so -> libfoo.so.X.Y.Z will break
otherwise.
Lintian could check for the dependency libfooX (= ${binary:Version})
in the control file
--
To UNSUBSCR
FYI: The status of the lintian source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.2.12
Current version: 2.2.13
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
l
retitle 528367 new Lintian checks for OCaml packages
tags 528367 + patch
thanks
Stephane Glondu a écrit :
> It would be nice to emit a Lintian error in the following circumstances:
> [...]
There are of course many other checks that we (OCaml maintainers) would
like Lintian to perform. Attached ar
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 528367 new Lintian checks for OCaml packages
Bug#528367: check for dangling OCaml cmx/cmxa files
Changed Bug title to `new Lintian checks for OCaml packages' from `check for
dangling OCaml cmx/cmxa files'.
> tags 528367 + patch
Bug#52836
Andrew Lee writes:
> Some packages use 'OnlyShowIn=GNOME;' or 'OnlyShowIn=GNOME;XFCE;' or
> even OnlyShowIn=GNOME;KDE;XFCE; in it's XDG's .desktop file. But these
> packages are also works in desktops other than the desktops specificed,
> such as LXDE.
This is an intended and supported feature o
Package: lintian
Version: 2.2.12
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
Some packages use 'OnlyShowIn=GNOME;' or 'OnlyShowIn=GNOME;XFCE;' or
even OnlyShowIn=GNOME;KDE;XFCE; in it's XDG's .desktop file. But these
packages are also works in desktops other than the desktops specificed,
such as LXDE.
"Dmitry E. Oboukhov" writes:
> As i wrote i could make (and maintain) such test, but if this test
> places outside lintian, it will not interested: lintian checks are
> starded by such utilities as dpkg-buildpackage, qa.debian.org contains
> lintian reports, etc and additional _lintian_ test woul
"Dmitry E. Oboukhov" writes:
> I think, these tests could be added as additional option for lintian.
> Also lintian can have no depends to apt-file: it can have apt-hook
> script which would download Content.gz into private lintian directory.
We've discussed this a few times over the years. Lin
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 537672 [external] check for package conflicts
Bug#537672: Please add new test: conflict packages
Changed Bug title to `[external] check for package conflicts' from `Please add
new test: conflict packages'.
>
End of message, stopping proc
On 06:16 Mon 20 Jul , Russ Allbery wrote:
RA> "Dmitry E. Oboukhov" writes:
>> I think, these tests could be added as additional option for lintian.
>> Also lintian can have no depends to apt-file: it can have apt-hook
>> script which would download Content.gz into private lintian directory.
On 05:11 Mon 20 Jul , Russ Allbery wrote:
RA> tags 537672 wontfix
RA> merge 293838 537672
RA> thanks
RA> "Dmitry E. Oboukhov" writes:
>> Today I have been asked about new package 'qconf' which contains the
>> file /usr/bin/qconf. This package has conflict with gridengine-client:
>>
>> $
Rene Engelhard writes:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Again here, Lintian has no real hope of being able to figure this out.
>> When you're doing unusual things like this, you're going to need to use
>> overrides.
> I don't see how this is uncommon..
Well, this is the first report of it that we've ev
tags 537672 wontfix
merge 293838 537672
thanks
"Dmitry E. Oboukhov" writes:
> Today I have been asked about new package 'qconf' which contains the
> file /usr/bin/qconf. This package has conflict with gridengine-client:
>
> $ apt-file search qconf|grep /usr/bin/qconf
> gridengine-client:
Rene Engelhard writes:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Rene Engelhard writes:
>>> [ this time important, because of the upcoming "rejection on lintian
>>> errors" thing. ]
>> You have gotten false information from somewhere. No such thing is
>> happening or proposed so far as I know.
> Oh?
>
> http:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 537672 wontfix
Bug#537672: Please add new test: conflict packages
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> merge 293838 537672
Bug#293838: [external] file overlap check
Bug#537672: Please add new test: conflict packages
Merged 293838 53
On Jul 20, 2009, at 11:55, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Jeremiah Foster a écrit :
I read on debian-devel that lintian can use a subset of tags
when it
checks packages. This might be a useful feature for downstream
projects,
like maemo, which might be able to use only a limited amount of
lint
Jeremiah Foster a écrit :
> I read on debian-devel that lintian can use a subset of tags when it
> checks packages. This might be a useful feature for downstream projects,
> like maemo, which might be able to use only a limited amount of lintian
> tags and would like to use their own.
>
>
Hello,
I read on debian-devel that lintian can use a subset of tags when it
checks packages. This might be a useful feature for downstream
projects, like maemo, which might be able to use only a limited amount
of lintian tags and would like to use their own.
Is there documentatio
Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
> I've implemented this check in the attached patch.
Here is an updated patch, thanks to Raphael Geissert's comments.
Cheers,
--
Stéphane
>From c61138eb5e629d6f245ccd72f3070e4e8805b9fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephane Glondu
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 11:23:40 +02
Hi,
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Rene Engelhard writes:
>
> > No, I do *not* use ucf in this package.
> >
> > (Though, yes, it's mentioned in three *functions* defined in the source
> > but they are not used in this package.
>
> Again here, Lintian has no real hope of being able to figure this out.
>
Hi,
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Rene Engelhard writes:
>
> > [ this time important, because of the upcoming "rejection on lintian
> > errors" thing. ]
>
> You have gotten false information from somewhere. No such thing is
> happening or proposed so far as I know.
Oh?
http://lists.debian.org/debian
retitle 537672 Please add new test: conflict packages
thanks
I think, i could write a patch for this bug, but i don't know which of
cases i must select:
* create additional check in directory checks/, or
* patch exists check
I think we can add apt-file to Recommends or Suggests section and us
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 537672 Please add new test: conflict packages
Bug#537672: Please add test
Changed Bug title to `Please add new test: conflict packages' from `Please add
test'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
25 matches
Mail list logo
