> I assume from that that dpatch supports DEP-3 and doesn't get confused by
> comments not using that prefix?
The patches apply cleanly. So I assume, yes. Header is maintained by
dpatch-edit-patch when the @DPATCH@ tag is found (according to it's own
comments).
Paul
signature.asc
Description:
FYI: The status of the lintian source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.2.14
Current version: 2.2.17
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
l
> The operation that I'd want to be sure to test is modifying the patch
> and regenerating it and being sure that dpatch retained the comments
> rather than rewriting the header and losing them.
Just did that and no problem.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: lintian
Version: 2.2.17
Severity: normal
Hi,
The tag maintainer-script-needs-depends-on-update-inetd recommends to depend
on either inet-superserver or update-inetd, when it fact the later is
redundant (a dependency on inet-superserver indirectly satisfies the
update-inetd dependency)
A
Package: lintian
Version: 2.2.17
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
Is it out of scope a check for duplicated entries in debian/control (for fields
like Build-Depends, Depends, Recommends, Suggests, Conflicts, Provides,
Replaces)?
For example:
Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (>= 7), cdbs
It could detec
Serafeim Zanikolas writes:
> The tag maintainer-script-needs-depends-on-update-inetd recommends to
> depend on either inet-superserver or update-inetd, when it fact the
> later is redundant (a dependency on inet-superserver indirectly
> satisfies the update-inetd dependency)
I don't understand t
"Nelson A. de Oliveira" writes:
> Is it out of scope a check for duplicated entries in debian/control (for
> fields like Build-Depends, Depends, Recommends, Suggests, Conflicts,
> Provides, Replaces)?
> For example:
> Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (>= 7), cdbs
> It could detect that cdbs
Package: lintian
Version: 2.2.17
Severity: normal
Dear Lintian maintainers,
I have just checked at manual pages that triggers
hyphen-used-as-minus-sign informational reports, like samtools(1) for
instance, and I did not experience any problem in searching for the
minus sign. I wonder if hyph
Charles Plessy writes:
> I have just checked at manual pages that triggers
> hyphen-used-as-minus-sign informational reports, like samtools(1) for
> instance, and I did not experience any problem in searching for the
> minus sign. I wonder if hyphen-used-as-minus-sign is not massively
> triggerin
9 matches
Mail list logo
