-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hey Lintian maintainers
Do any of you know if we really have a false-positive here? If we do, I
can work on applying the patch and testing it.
~Niels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 9b91a86686d009beeb9aa337e74ce07de44ff5dd
Author: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net
Date: Wed Jan 5 09:35:37 2011 +0100
Made extra-license-file check ignore all files marked executable.
Removed exception for bin-directories
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-01-04 19:07, Russ Allbery wrote:
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net writes:
Excluding all binaries and known scripts might be a good idea, but I
have not deployed that change. Perhaps some of the other Lintian
maintainers can comment on
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 9367c457be54ad2d8aaf274640b9e1c5a24c2c5f
Author: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net
Date: Wed Jan 5 16:39:16 2011 +0100
Fix issues where lintian relied on $1 having a sane value after a failed
regex match. $N may contain the
tag 586313 + patch
thanks
Hi,
I've made a patch that fix this bug.
The only thing that still need to be done is to write good description
for the new tags.
Cheers
Laurent Bigonville checks/shared-libs | 27 +++
checks/shared-libs.desc
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 586313 + patch
Bug #586313 [lintian] [new check] Check if package contains .la file
Added tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
586313:
Hi,
Better version of the patch.
Cheers
Laurent Bigonville checks/shared-libs | 28 +++
checks/shared-libs.desc| 10 +++
t/tests/shared-libs-la-files/debian/debian/install |1 +
Laurent Bigonville bi...@debian.org writes:
diff --git a/checks/shared-libs b/checks/shared-libs
index 6fb812d..4ed36cf 100644
--- a/checks/shared-libs
+++ b/checks/shared-libs
@@ -164,18 +164,23 @@ for my $cur_file (@{$info-sorted_index}) {
local $_;
open(LAFILE,
The branch, infra-513663 has been created
at 686f786a0439e0c90e27e1f50246a96f5f436913 (commit)
- Shortlog
commit 686f786a0439e0c90e27e1f50246a96f5f436913
Author: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net
Date: Wed Jan 5 22:20:08 2011
Le Wed, 05 Jan 2011 12:32:55 -0800,
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org a écrit :
Laurent Bigonville bi...@debian.org writes:
diff --git a/checks/shared-libs b/checks/shared-libs
index 6fb812d..4ed36cf 100644
--- a/checks/shared-libs
+++ b/checks/shared-libs
@@ -164,18 +164,23 @@ for my
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net writes:
I understood from [1] that there has been an interest in rewriting the
lintian man pages in POD, so I spent a couple of hours doing just that.
I figured that the CHECKS and COLLECTION sections of the lintian manpage
could mostly be auto-generated from
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net writes:
Right, there is a check for that... but:
cat t/tests/shared-libs-non-pic-i386/debian/debian/symbols:
libbaz3.so libfilo #MINVER#
p...@base 1.0
does not trigger an issue and I cannot figure out why! I am fairly
confident that something is wrong,
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net writes:
Thanks for maintaining a wonderful Debian development tool!
While packaging NetBSD's new netpgp tool (ITP #599753), I found that
Lintian is IMHO being a bit too strict in looking for hyphens in mdoc
manual pages. What do you think of the attached
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net writes:
I have had a look at this nearly 2 year old bug and I think it would be
great if we could find a solution for cross-package checks. To make it
even better I am interested in working on this. That being said I have
not work on Lintian for very long so
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net writes:
I made a suggestion on how to implement this, although I am a bit
conflicted. On one hand I would like to add it to the cruft check (where
the substvars check is) on the other hand it is also related to
debhelper (which is where I added it).
If anyone
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net writes:
I am considering to just make the switch to use Email::Valid. I have
attached a patch that makes the switch and introduces a regression test
to catch the particular issue in #602619.
The only caveat with using Email::Valid is that Debian Policy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-01-06 01:01, Russ Allbery wrote:
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net writes:
I am considering to just make the switch to use Email::Valid. I have
attached a patch that makes the switch and introduces a regression test
to catch the
17 matches
Mail list logo
