Bug#658827: lintian: compare pkg version with shlib/symbols version

2012-02-06 Thread Niels Thykier
Source: lintian Version: 2.5.4 Severity: wishlist Consistency check of epochs might be a good idea[1]. Kudos to Jakub Wilk for suggesting it. ~Niels [1] Example being attr that was epoched years ago, but until 2 months ago, it had an "epochless" version in its shlibs file. http://packages.qa.

Bug#658847: lintian: checks for proper use of dpkg-maintscript-helper

2012-02-06 Thread Sam Morris
Package: lintian Version: 2.5.4 Severity: wishlist A package that wants to invoke dpkg-maintscript-helper must do so in each of its preinst, postinst and postrm files. However, I've noticed several packages that do not use dpkg-maintscript-helper properly: for x in {pre,post}{inst,rm}; do

urgent product needed

2012-02-06 Thread MR . STEVEN GORDON
Steven Gordon Ltd United kingdom 12/20 broad street,London,England I saw a similar and latest product design on trade production design webiste which choosed to be the product design i want and i will need this particular design in large quantity. To view the picture you need to click the link be

Bug#658920: lintian: AGPLv3 not accepted bye Lintian

2012-02-06 Thread Bas van den Dikkenberg
Package: lintian Version: 2.5.4 Severity: normal Dear Lintian maintainers, I get this messages when checking my packages: E: burp: copyright-should-refer-to-common-license-file-for-gpl N: N:The strings "GNU General Public License" or "GPL" appear in the N:copyright file for this package

Bug#658920: lintian: AGPLv3 not accepted bye Lintian

2012-02-06 Thread Russ Allbery
Bas van den Dikkenberg writes: > So the messages is incorrect, can you please correct tis isue. > I will add a copy of my copyright file: > Upstream Author(s): > Copyright: > License: AGPLv3 > For the most part, Burp is licensed under the AGPL version 3. This > code is listed under Copyright Fr

Bug#658920: marked as done (lintian: AGPLv3 not accepted bye Lintian)

2012-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 6 Feb 2012 20:23:28 + with message-id <9345AD5DE363814DA41482800A8D50641C8B8E8C@srv01.dikkenberg.local> and subject line no bug has caused the Debian Bug report #658920, regarding lintian: AGPLv3 not accepted bye Lintian to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#658971: lintian: exits 1 without any policy violations/errors/warnings checking epoptes

2012-02-06 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
Package: lintian Version: 2.5.4 Severity: normal since epoptes 0.3.2, lintian will exit 1 when checking epoptes, but produces no policy violations or other warnings or errors... you can download the .dsc from your favorite debian mirror, and: lintian epoptes_0.4.2-1.dsc ; echo $? 1 running with

Bug#658971: lintian: exits 1 without any policy violations/errors/warnings checking epoptes

2012-02-06 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Vagrant Cascadian , 2012-02-06, 16:28: since epoptes 0.3.2, lintian will exit 1 when checking epoptes, but produces no policy violations or other warnings or errors... you can download the .dsc from your favorite debian mirror, and: lintian epoptes_0.4.2-1.dsc ; echo $? 1 Apparently this i

experimental tags (was: Re: Bug#658971: lintian: exits 1 without any policy violations/errors/warnings checking epoptes)

2012-02-06 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 01:53 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > Apparently this is because of this tag, which would be an error if it > weren't experimental: [...] > So it's probably a bug in lintian, which was latent until very recently, > because we hadn't tags with such property. If you mean experimen