Bug#765995: lintian: Use of uninitialized value $base in substitution (s///) at /usr/share/lintian/checks/watch-file.pm line 137, $_[...] line 2.

2014-10-20 Thread Axel Beckert
Package: lintian Version: 2.5.28 Severity: minor Dear Lintian Maintainers, a broken debian/watch file caused an interesting lintian behaviour. Given a watch file like this: version=3 opts=pgpsigurlmangle=s/$/.asc/ http://www.example.com/Downloads/code-(.+)code\.zip This watch file has two

Bug#766033: [checks/rules] empty debian/rules - Use of uninitialized value $start in pattern match

2014-10-20 Thread Jakub Wilk
Package: lintian Version: 2.5.28 Severity: minor Empty debian/rules triggers the following warning: Use of uninitialized value $start in pattern match (m//) at /usr/share/lintian/checks/rules.pm line 142. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org

[lintian] 01/01: ubuntu/.../known-dists: Add vivid

2014-10-20 Thread Niels Thykier
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. nthykier pushed a commit to branch master in repository lintian. commit be93c22af022adf1017e9f6e032de0cab27e725a Author: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net Date: Mon Oct 20 18:40:04 2014 +0200 ubuntu/.../known-dists: Add

[lintian] branch master updated (e762015 - be93c22)

2014-10-20 Thread Niels Thykier
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. nthykier pushed a change to branch master in repository lintian. from e762015 Implement new build profile syntax new be93c22 ubuntu/.../known-dists: Add vivid The 1 revisions listed above as new are entirely

[lintian] branch master updated (be93c22 - b5f9842)

2014-10-20 Thread Niels Thykier
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. nthykier pushed a change to branch master in repository lintian. from be93c22 ubuntu/.../known-dists: Add vivid new b5f9842 c/src-copyright.pm: Optimise out linear scan over index The 1 revisions listed above

[lintian] branch master updated (b5f9842 - 7366d6a)

2014-10-20 Thread Niels Thykier
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. nthykier pushed a change to branch master in repository lintian. from b5f9842 c/src-copyright.pm: Optimise out linear scan over index new 7366d6a c/watch-file.pm: Fix undef warning The 1 revisions listed above

Processed: limit source to lintian, tagging 765995

2014-10-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: limit source lintian Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'lintian' Limit currently set to 'source':'lintian' tags 765995 + pending Bug #765995 [lintian] lintian: Use of uninitialized value $base in substitution

[lintian] branch master updated (7366d6a - 6b1f37d)

2014-10-20 Thread Niels Thykier
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. nthykier pushed a change to branch master in repository lintian. from 7366d6a c/watch-file.pm: Fix undef warning new 6b1f37d c/src-copyright.pm: Optimise for * and dir/* wildcards The 1 revisions listed above

Processed: limit source to lintian, tagging 766033

2014-10-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: limit source lintian Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'lintian' Limit currently set to 'source':'lintian' tags 766033 + pending Bug #766033 [lintian] [checks/rules] empty debian/rules - Use of uninitialized value

[lintian] branch master updated (6b1f37d - e73f842)

2014-10-20 Thread Niels Thykier
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. nthykier pushed a change to branch master in repository lintian. from 6b1f37d c/src-copyright.pm: Optimise for * and dir/* wildcards new e73f842 c/rules.pm: Fix undef warning on empty rules file The 1

Bug#762154: lintian: ignore header's license field for missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright ?

2014-10-20 Thread Ben Finney
On 19-Sep-2014, Charles Plessy wrote: I have a package where the machine-readable copyright file has the following licence field in its header. License: GPL-2 and MIT and GPL-3+ with runtime exception and zlib BEDTools combines source code under GPL-2, LGPL-2.1 and MIT licenses, and

Bug#766118: lintian: False positive for “missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright”

2014-10-20 Thread Russ Allbery
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes: The check for “missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright” apparently assumes that any license must have its own separate “License” paragraph. I'm not sure what's going on here, but it's definitely not that. I put the license text immediately

Bug#766118: lintian: False positive for “missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright”

2014-10-20 Thread Ben Finney
On 20-Oct-2014, Russ Allbery wrote: I don't see any problem with Lintian 2.5.28, and I see on the Lintian report page that it was processed with Lintian 2.5.26. I see the problem with Lintian 2.5.28:: = $ lintian --version Lintian v2.5.28 $ lintian

Bug#766118: lintian: False positive for “missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright”

2014-10-20 Thread Russ Allbery
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes: On 20-Oct-2014, Russ Allbery wrote: I don't see any problem with Lintian 2.5.28, and I see on the Lintian report page that it was processed with Lintian 2.5.26. I see the problem with Lintian 2.5.28:: = $ lintian --version Lintian v2.5.28

Bug#762154: lintian: ignore header's license field for missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright ?

2014-10-20 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 10:45:49AM +1100, Ben Finney a écrit : On 19-Sep-2014, Charles Plessy wrote: I have a package where the machine-readable copyright file has the following licence field in its header. License: GPL-2 and MIT and GPL-3+ with runtime exception and zlib