tags 871957 + pending
thanks
Thanks for the report. This was fixed a little while ago in Git:
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=8914bb025f975e4a5584a3a0203cf808f3d0a430
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 871957 + pending
Bug #871957 [lintian] [lintian] orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature should
exclude repacks
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
871957: https://bugs.debi
Russ,
On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 7:59 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Paul Hardy writes:
>
> > Osamu: I did not mean just accept one format--I meant accept both ".asc"
> > and ".sig" files for ".changes", ".dsc", and uscan files. I suppose all
> > three manuals you mentioned could be modified to docume
Paul Hardy writes:
> Osamu: I did not mean just accept one format--I meant accept both ".asc"
> and ".sig" files for ".changes", ".dsc", and uscan files. I suppose all
> three manuals you mentioned could be modified to document this.
> I had not brought this up until the latest lintian check on
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 871957 [lintian] orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature should
> exclude repacks
Bug #871957 [lintian] [uscan] orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature should
exclude repacks
Changed Bug title to '[lintian] orig-tarball-missing-upstream-
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.52
Severity: normal
Upstream does not sign my repacks :o).
Please don't trigger orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature if the
version contains +ds, +debian, or +dfsg.
Cheers,
--
Alexandre Viau
av...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signatu
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.52
Severity: normal
Hi!
For all 32-bit architectures lintian complains if functions using off_t
instead of off64_t are used. On legacy architectures, this is indeed a good
check, as for old ABI compatibility reasons sizeof(off_t) is only 4.
However, new 32-bit archi
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 5:13 AM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 10:48:08AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> ...
> > On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 20:26:41 -0700, Paul Hardy wrote:
> > > Also, where signature files are desired, I think it would be
> beneficial to
> > > also accept binary
tags 871791 + pending
thanks
Fixed in Git:
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=10d51c29cbd8c065b3f1544fc5214570c96ef395
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 871791 + pending
Bug #871791 [lintian] lintian: spelling-error-in-{binary,manpage} "CAs Case"
annoying for cryptographic software
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
871791:
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
lamby pushed a commit to branch master
in repository lintian.
commit 10d51c29cbd8c065b3f1544fc5214570c96ef395
Author: Chris Lamb
Date: Sat Aug 12 13:39:14 2017 -0400
Avoid false positives in spelling-error-in-{binary,manpa
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
lamby pushed a change to branch master
in repository lintian.
from 213f030 Avoid false positive for link to license
new 10d51c2 Avoid false positives in
spelling-error-in-{binary,manpage} for "CAs" which was an
12 matches
Mail list logo