Bug#874078: lintian: improve binary-file-built-without-LFS-support info field

Hi again Guillem (sorry I misspelt your surname :), On Mon, 4 Sep 2017, Guillem Jover wrote: On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 00:23:42 +0200, Boud Roukema wrote: At https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=871956 Guillem Rover proposes to revert this patch (for bug #874078) and make a better one

Bug#874078: lintian: improve binary-file-built-without-LFS-support info field

Hi! On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 00:23:42 +0200, Boud Roukema wrote: > At https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=871956 > Guillem Rover proposes to revert this patch (for bug #874078) and make a > better > one. Here's my proposal, let me know if this clarifies it sufficiently. :) Thanks, Gu

Bug#874078: lintian: improve binary-file-built-without-LFS-support info field

At https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=871956 Guillem Rover proposes to revert this patch (for bug #874078) and make a better one. Just to summarise again the point that to me still seems valid after Guillem's clarification on p(write|read)(|64): to me it's confusing to have text th

Bug#871956: lintian: false positive: binary-file-built-without-LFS-support on x32

On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 15:02:03 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > > I'd suggest just marking what we have an idea about. It's not > > like lintian warnings matter for something that's not in the archive... > > That's true. > > (Implementation braindump for anyone interested in jumping in: we > could sim

Bug#871956: lintian: false positive: binary-file-built-without-LFS-support on x32

hi Guillem, all, On Sun, 3 Sep 2017, Guillem Jover wrote: When you define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 the interfaces are transparently mapped to the 64-bit variants and no other code change is required. So you *must* not be switching from foo to foo64 in the call sites. This is IMO the preferred way t

Bug#871956: lintian: false positive: binary-file-built-without-LFS-support on x32

On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 11:38:28PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 21:35:07 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > > The problem is in snowflake packages that do things their own way and enable > > LFS only when it's actually needed. Here's where the lintian false positive > > triggers.

Bug#871956: lintian: false positive: binary-file-built-without-LFS-support on x32

On Sat, 2017-09-02 at 21:47:15 +0200, Boud Roukema wrote: > On Sat, 2 Sep 2017, Adam Borowski wrote: > > > AC_SYS_LARGEFILE on i386 (linux) for mpgrafic-0.3.15-1 apparently does > > > *not* > > > always do the right thing > > Nope, you use pwrite() not pwrite64() -- on i386 you need the latter to

Bug#871956: lintian: false positive: binary-file-built-without-LFS-support on x32

On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 21:35:07 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > And what AC_SYS_LARGEFILE does, at least on Linux, is to return a hardcoded > setting so programs switch from off_t to off64_t whether they need to or > not. This does the right thing on old 32-bit archs and is harmless on > 64-bit and n

Processed: Re: lintian: please check latest-debian-changelog-entry-without-new-date for sources as well

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 873612 + patch Bug #873612 [lintian] lintian: please check latest-debian-changelog-entry-without-new-date for sources as well Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 873612: https

Bug#873612: lintian: please check latest-debian-changelog-entry-without-new-date for sources as well

tags 873612 + patch thanks Hi Lintian devs, > lintian: please check latest-debian-changelog-entry-without-new-date > for sources as well Patch attached; could I get some review? I tried to add the check within changelog-file.pm by making it "Type: source, binary", but it required too many condit

Bug#874121: lintian: Please add more packagename to section mappings

Hi! On Sun, 2017-09-03 at 16:23:45 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Package: lintian > Version: 2.5.52 > Severity: wishlist > User: guardi...@namespace.hadrons.org > Usertags: sectionspace-violations > Here's an untested update of the packagename to section mapping > including several other common p

About desktop-command-not-in-package

Hello, Recently I'm running lintian and I got this message: desktop-command-not-in-package usr/share/applications/uget-gtk.desktop env and the entry in the desktop file (by the upstream) is: Exec=env GDK_BACKEND=x11 uget-gtk %u I'd like to know if it's ok or it's a false positive, because I was

Bug#874121: lintian: Please add more packagename to section mappings

Package: lintian Version: 2.5.52 Severity: wishlist User: guardi...@namespace.hadrons.org Usertags: sectionspace-violations Hi! Here's an untested update of the packagename to section mapping including several other common patterns. Thanks, Guillem From cfe345d523ced980fcea149cca7b09d85b2e375c M

Bug#796562: marked as done (Please identify lack of UBSAN compiler/linker flags)

Your message dated Sun, 03 Sep 2017 13:54:52 +0200 with message-id <85tw0km1yr@boum.org> and subject line Re: Bug#796562: lintian: Please identify lack of sanitation compiler/linker flags has caused the Debian Bug report #796562, regarding Please identify lack of UBSAN compiler/linker flags to

Bug#870069: orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature error breaks rebuilding existing packages and more

Hi, On 09/03/2017 06:20 AM, Paul Hardy wrote: > On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Chris Lamb wrote: >> ... >> See #870722. This was fixed in 4th August in: >> >> >> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=126157380dc0eba302f3d476b1cffc13f968c207 > > That is great. The nex

Processed: Re: lintian: Please add a test which checks Vcs-Browser headers for hardcoded revisions/commits

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 681713 + pending Bug #681713 [lintian] lintian: Please add a test which checks Vcs-Browser headers for hardcoded revisions/commits Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 681713

Bug#681713: lintian: Please add a test which checks Vcs-Browser headers for hardcoded revisions/commits

tags 681713 + pending thanks Fixed in Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=d8a828ac8b5740257314cfc40340b1c2d72f2911 Best wishes, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-

[lintian] branch master updated (790b236 -> d8a828a)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. lamby pushed a change to branch master in repository lintian. from 790b236 Add missing hunk from 98fbf8152be2b67a63feb22f0ace8a8b292c0c1a. new d8a828a Check for packages including "?rev=0&sc=0" in Vcs-Browser.

[lintian] 01/01: Check for packages including "?rev=0&sc=0" in Vcs-Browser. (Closes; #681713)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. lamby pushed a commit to branch master in repository lintian. commit d8a828ac8b5740257314cfc40340b1c2d72f2911 Author: Chris Lamb Date: Sun Sep 3 09:18:38 2017 +0100 Check for packages including "?rev=0&sc=0" in Vcs-Browser

Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_sid #1898

See

Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #1897

See -- [...truncated 792.17 KB...] tests::testsuite-unknown-suite tests::testsuite-unknown-suite tests::source-copyright-unique tests::source-copyright-unique tests:

Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #1896

See Changes: [lamby] Drop problematic missing-classpath check. (Closes: #857123) [lamby] Also close #870069 by downgrading the severity. -- [...truncated 791.69 KB...]

[lintian] 01/01: Add missing hunk from 98fbf8152be2b67a63feb22f0ace8a8b292c0c1a.

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. lamby pushed a commit to branch master in repository lintian. commit 790b236d870a2c58ebb1585e05aebce44e4cd1cc Author: Chris Lamb Date: Sun Sep 3 08:11:02 2017 +0100 Add missing hunk from 98fbf8152be2b67a63feb22f0ace8a8b292

[lintian] branch master updated (aac7528 -> 790b236)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. lamby pushed a change to branch master in repository lintian. from aac7528 Also close #870069 by downgrading the severity. new 790b236 Add missing hunk from 98fbf8152be2b67a63feb22f0ace8a8b292c0c1a. The 1 revi