Bug#916901: lintian: package-contains-no-arch-dependent-files false positive on -dev package with /usr/lib//libfoo.so -> libfoo.so.1

2018-12-19 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: lintian Version: 2.5.117 Severity: normal Hi, this seems to be a recent regression: X: libcupti-dev: package-contains-no-arch-dependent-files package contents: drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2018-12-11 22:15 ./ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2018-12-11 22:15 ./usr/ drwxr-xr-x root/roo

Bug#916735: lintian: appstream-metadata-missing-modalias-provide should be info, not warn

2018-12-19 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, 2018-12-19 at 07:28 +, Scott Kitterman wrote: > I'm not arguing it's a bad idea to have the check, but personally, I > get tired of looking at it. If this is important, get it in Policy > as a should and then I think warning would be appropriate. > > Why don't I just fix it? I read

Bug#657390: TY

2018-12-19 Thread alexander galvan
Enviado desde mi iPhone

Bug#916735: lintian: appstream-metadata-missing-modalias-provide should be info, not warn

2018-12-19 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, 2018-12-19 at 10:57 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi Paul, > > > Downgrading it to info level means that almost no-one will know about > > it, so you might as well just delete the tag instead. > > I don't agree with this view of "I" tags but playing severity wars is > not my idea of a good t

Bug#916021: lintian: Please check for references to build directory

2018-12-19 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Dmitry, > PS. Any chance to configure your fine gitlab auto-notifier to send > not only diffstat, but whole diff too? I used to do this manually but it was a bit annoying and sometimes far too long. The new gitlab auto-notifier is not maintainer by me, but the source is indeed in Salsa if

Bug#916877: lintian: check that 1.2-3~debXuY changelog stanza follows a 1.2-3 changelog stanza

2018-12-19 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: lintian Severity: wishlist Hi, I just wanted to answer "Is #910434 fixed in sid?" but the changelog entry is inconclusive ... spamassassin (3.4.2-1~deb9u1) stretch; urgency=high * lots of changes spamassassin (3.4.1-8) unstable; urgency=medium * lost of changes ... I would ra

Bug#916095: lintian: False positive: license-problem-gfdl-invariants

2018-12-19 Thread Chris Lamb
Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > with no invariant sections, no Front-Cover and no Back-Cover texts > with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover andBack-Cover texts Neat. Can you try: --- a/checks/cruft.pm +++ b/checks/cruft.pm @@ -1379,7 +1379,7 @@ sub _check_gfdl_license_problem {

Bug#916735: lintian: appstream-metadata-missing-modalias-provide should be info, not warn

2018-12-19 Thread Chris Lamb
tags 916735 - pending tags 916735 + moreinfo thanks Hi Paul, > Downgrading it to info level means that almost no-one will know about > it, so you might as well just delete the tag instead. I don't agree with this view of "I" tags but playing severity wars is not my idea of a good time so I've re

Processed: Re: Bug#916735: lintian: appstream-metadata-missing-modalias-provide should be info, not warn

2018-12-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 916735 - pending Bug #916735 [lintian] lintian: appstream-metadata-missing-modalias-provide should be info, not warn Removed tag(s) pending. > tags 916735 + moreinfo Bug #916735 [lintian] lintian: appstream-metadata-missing-modalias-provide

Processed: Bug #916735 in lintian marked as pending

2018-12-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #916735 [lintian] lintian: appstream-metadata-missing-modalias-provide should be info, not warn Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #916735 to the same tags previously set -- 916735: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=916735 Deb