Bug#959067: lintian: License paragraph must appear below License line referencing that paragraph in copyright file

Package: lintian Version: 2.62.0 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I have multiple sets of files in my library that are under the same license, and that license is not in /usr/share/common-license. When I tried to add a License paragraph for this license at the beginning of the copyright file,

Re: New changelog commits in release cycle

Hi Chris, On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 4:02 PM Chris Lamb wrote: > > do you have some specific issue? I don't. I just hoped to avoid friction in the future if there had been any. Thanks for letting me know! Kind regards Felix Lechner

Re: New changelog commits in release cycle

Hi Felix, > Due to Salsa downtime earlier today, some commits of mine may have > interfered with your release. (I think it happened to another > contributor, as well.) Did that bother you, or did it create any kind > of problem for you? No, but judging by your email do you have some specific

Bug#959037: lintian: FPOS? for executable-in-usr-lib

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:49:56PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: >On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 02:39:49PM -0700, Felix Lechner wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 4:27 AM Mattia Rizzolo wrote: >> > I'm CCing d-boot@ for confirmation, since I'm not sure if maybe I'm >> > doing something wrong. >> > >> >

New changelog commits in release cycle

Hi Chris, Due to Salsa downtime earlier today, some commits of mine may have interfered with your release. (I think it happened to another contributor, as well.) Did that bother you, or did it create any kind of problem for you? Kind regards Felix Lechner

lintian_2.69.0_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 19:46:15 + Source: lintian Architecture: source Version: 2.69.0 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Lintian Maintainers Changed-By: Chris Lamb Closes: 798762 958794 958845

Bug#959037: lintian: FPOS? for executable-in-usr-lib

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 02:39:49PM -0700, Felix Lechner wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 4:27 AM Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > I'm CCing d-boot@ for confirmation, since I'm not sure if maybe I'm > > doing something wrong. > > > > Today I notices these tags: > > > > P: eatmydata-udeb udeb:

Bug#959037: lintian: FPOS? for executable-in-usr-lib

Hi Mattia, On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 4:27 AM Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > Package: lintian > Version: 2.68.0 > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-b...@lists.debian.org > > Hi, > > I'm CCing d-boot@ for confirmation, since I'm not sure if maybe I'm > doing something wrong. > > Today I notices these tags: > > P:

Bug#958932: marked as done (lintian: debhelper compat level 13 is no longer experimental)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Apr 2020 21:38:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#958932: fixed in lintian 2.69.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #958932, regarding lintian: debhelper compat level 13 is no longer experimental to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#958794: marked as done (lintian: runtime-test-file-uses-supported-python-versions-without-python-all-build-depends fires with )

Your message dated Tue, 28 Apr 2020 21:38:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#958794: fixed in lintian 2.69.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #958794, regarding lintian: runtime-test-file-uses-supported-python-versions-without-python-all-build-depends fires with to be marked as

Bug#958845: marked as done (false positive wildcard-matches-nothing-in-dep5-copyright)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Apr 2020 21:38:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#958845: fixed in lintian 2.69.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #958845, regarding false positive wildcard-matches-nothing-in-dep5-copyright to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#798762: marked as done (Lintian tag pre-depends-directly-on-multiarch-support too much debhelper-centric)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Apr 2020 21:38:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#798762: fixed in lintian 2.69.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #798762, regarding Lintian tag pre-depends-directly-on-multiarch-support too much debhelper-centric to be marked as done. This means that you

Processing of lintian_2.69.0_amd64.changes

lintian_2.69.0_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lintian_2.69.0.dsc lintian_2.69.0.tar.xz lintian_2.69.0_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Processed: Bug#958932 marked as pending in lintian

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #958932 [lintian] lintian: debhelper compat level 13 is no longer experimental Added tag(s) pending. -- 958932: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=958932 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 959037 lintian: possible false-positives for executable-in-usr-lib Bug #959037 [lintian] lintian: FPOS? for executable-in-usr-lib Changed Bug title to 'lintian: possible false-positives for executable-in-usr-lib' from 'lintian: FPOS? for

Bug#959037: lintian: FPOS? for executable-in-usr-lib

Package: lintian Version: 2.68.0 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-b...@lists.debian.org Hi, I'm CCing d-boot@ for confirmation, since I'm not sure if maybe I'm doing something wrong. Today I notices these tags: P: eatmydata-udeb udeb: executable-in-usr-lib usr/lib/finish-install.d/13eatmydata-udeb N: N: