Bug#961709: lintian: Warn if R binary packages don't depend on virtual r-api-* package

Hi Dirk, Le jeu. 28 mai 2020 à 18:03, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit : > > OTOH the way we implement the tag doesn't it get added automagically by the > r-base-core package when constructing an r-{cran,bioc,...}-* package? > Yes, it is. But, in one week I found by chance two packages (r-cran-isospec

Bug#922544: lintian: Mass tag rename to unify naming convention

Hi, On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 2:30 PM Chris Lamb wrote: > > > As I mentioned initially, I don't think the patch is ready as is, it > > even has syntax errors The suggestions from this bug report will be adopted in the near future. Kind regards Felix Lechner

Processed: lintian: Pending rename for some shared library tags

Processing control commands: > tags -1 - wontfix Bug #534938 [lintian] [general] tag names are inconsistent Removed tag(s) wontfix. -- 534938: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=534938 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#534938: lintian: Pending rename for some shared library tags

Control: tags -1 - wontfix Hi, > Probably only one prefix (shlib or shared-lib) should be used. I agree with this sentiment. This will be implemented in the near future. The new prefix will be shared-lib. > I'm not sure that it's worth the disruption The tag rename facility will make this proc

Bug#924715: marked as done (lintian: Please rename the process based on what it is done (i.e. set $0))

Your message dated Thu, 28 May 2020 12:06:30 -0700 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#924715: lintian: Please rename the process based on what it is done (i.e. set $0) has caused the Debian Bug report #924715, regarding lintian: Please rename the process based on what it is done (i.e. set

Bug#961709: lintian: Warn if R binary packages don't depend on virtual r-api-* package

On 28 May 2020 at 10:10, Dylan Aïssi wrote: | Package: lintian | Version: 2.77.1 | Severity: wishlist | X-Debbugs-CC: debia...@lists.debian.org | | Hi, | | I just saw a R binary package (r-cran-isospec) with wrong dependencies | (bug not yet opened). Lintian doesn't warn about a problem in its

Bug#961709: lintian: Warn if R binary packages don't depend on virtual r-api-* package

Hi Dylan, On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 10:10:54AM +0200, Dylan Aïssi wrote: > Package: lintian > Version: 2.77.1 > Severity: wishlist > X-Debbugs-CC: debia...@lists.debian.org > > Hi, > > I just saw a R binary package (r-cran-isospec) with wrong dependencies > (bug not yet opened). Lintian doesn't wa

Bug#961709: lintian: Warn if R binary packages don't depend on virtual r-api-* package

Hi, Le jeu. 28 mai 2020 à 10:15, Dylan Aïssi a écrit : > > I just saw a R binary package (r-cran-isospec) with wrong dependencies > Some days ago, I found another package with similar bug (r-bioc-mofa). Already fixed in unstable but the version in testing has wrong dependencies. This tag will he

Bug#961709: lintian: Warn if R binary packages don't depend on virtual r-api-* package

Package: lintian Version: 2.77.1 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debia...@lists.debian.org Hi, I just saw a R binary package (r-cran-isospec) with wrong dependencies (bug not yet opened). Lintian doesn't warn about a problem in its dependencies, so it would be cool to add a new warning (maybe "m