Processed: Bug#964073 marked as pending in lintian

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #964073 [lintian] lintian: Possible false positives for breakout-link for Lua modules Added tag(s) pending. -- 964073: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964073 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problem

Processed: tagging 964073

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 964073 - pending Bug #964073 [lintian] lintian: Possible false positives for breakout-link for Lua modules Removed tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 964073: https://bugs.debian.

Bug#964282: marked as pending in lintian

Hi Felix, Felix Lechner wrote: > > Why didn't the test suite catch that second case? > > The tests do not exercise all execution paths. :( I see. :-( > In our new coding practices, we try to separate diagnostics and > issuance like this (please see the use of the array @empty), but there > is l

Bug#964282: marked as pending in lintian

Hi Axel, On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 6:57 AM Axel Beckert wrote: > > Why didn't the test suite catch that second case? The tests do not exercise all execution paths. :( In our new coding practices, we try to separate diagnostics and issuance like this (please see the use of the array @empty), but th

Bug#964281: marked as pending in lintian

Hi Axel, On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 6:45 AM Axel Beckert wrote: > > > This commit has a potential to disturb the release process. The two tests t/recipes/checks/files/encoding/utf8-header-fix-encoding-patch/ t/recipes/checks/files/encoding/national-header-fix-encoding-patch/ contain legacy

Bug#964282: marked as pending in lintian

Hi Felix, Felix Lechner wrote: > Rename second mention of tag manpage-in-wrong-directory. (Closes: #964282) > > The tag was likely issued in two locations. Sometimes a second > location is forgotten when an editor is closed too quickly. Sure, that happens. What I mostly wondered: Why didn't the

Bug#964281: marked as pending in lintian

Hi Felix, Felix Lechner wrote: > In Debian patches, only check the DEP-3 header for legacy encoding. > (Closes: #964281) Yay, thanks! > Splits Debian patches into parts and only checks patch headers for > legacy encodings. Thank you to Axel Becker for that excellent idea. Thanks for the praise.

Programmatic exemptions for lintian are obsolete

Hi, Traditionally, we exempted Lintian from its own checks when the test suite triggered a tag. With this commit, it should no longer be necessary: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/commit/4f4654ddfd2841f5440a83bc3f30b6091b10986c The commit automatically exempts Lintian's test suit

Processed: Bug#964281 marked as pending in lintian

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #964281 [lintian] lintian: tag national-encoding emitted for patches fixing this tag Added tag(s) pending. -- 964281: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964281 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems