Bug#943525: marked as done (lintian: Create private name spaces for tags)

2020-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jul 2020 20:40:28 -0700 with message-id and subject line Implemented as an optional feature has caused the Debian Bug report #943525, regarding lintian: Create private name spaces for tags to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Team Lintian checks and tags now part of mainline

2020-07-13 Thread Felix Lechner
Dear Perl Team, Starting with Lintian's next release, your team's checks and tags are part of our mainline program. Details are available here: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/commit/3afe3b88ff8f5090335e82843bb002cb1922199a No more merge requests from our side. Plus, you will even

Bug#964971: lintian: please consider new check: expired keys in debian/upstream/signing-key.asc

2020-07-13 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > After extending the key I re-pushed it to keyservers, but did not > regenerate the d/u/signing-key.asc export. (I'd like to automate > that regeneration, since my key appears in multiple packages' > signing-key.asc files, but that's a question for another thread.) That

Bug#819460: lintian: duplicate-updaterc.d-calls-in-postinst false positive

2020-07-13 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Richard, > FYI, I also had to silence a duplicate-updaterc.d-calls-in-postinst > false positive in ddclient. The two calls to update-rc.d are in the two > branches of an 'if' statement, so it is not actually called twice. > > See lines 139 and 149 of: > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/ddclien

Bug#964971: lintian: please consider new check: expired keys in debian/upstream/signing-key.asc

2020-07-13 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Package: lintian Version: 2.83.0 Severity: wishlist Tags: upstream Dear Maintainer, I noticed yesterday that the current source package of zsh-syntax-highlighting contains a debian/upstream/signing-key.asc file which contains an expired snapshot of upstream's signing key: the snapshot gives the k

Bug#964013: lintian: embedded-javascript-library should flag sphinx files too

2020-07-13 Thread Alexis Murzeau
Le 13/07/2020 à 12:43, Holger Levsen a écrit : > > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/developers-reference/-/commit/29014c3d02b1a44aa983557b4887f4302c2136c5 > shows how to use dh_sphinxdoc (instead of dh_linktree which also does > and did the right thing here), which then in turn adds the right > de

Bug#964013: lintian: embedded-javascript-library should flag sphinx files too

2020-07-13 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 12:24:53PM +0200, Alexis Murzeau wrote: > I'm getting this new lintian warning for language_data.js, > but I can't find which binary package I should depend on. > > "sphinx" (as suggested by lintian) is a virtual package provided by > python3-sphinx > which doesn't co

Bug#964013: lintian: embedded-javascript-library should flag sphinx files too

2020-07-13 Thread Alexis Murzeau
Hi, On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 13:45:07 +0200 Holger Levsen wrote: > [...] > > Out of these, three of them come from Sphinx: > - doctools.js > - language_data.js > - searchtools.js > > Please make lintian complain about embedding those. It seems the problem could > be quite widespread: > [...] I'm ge

Bug#964770: lintian: lintian will get stuck on arm64

2020-07-13 Thread Felix Lechner
Hi Kentaro, On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 5:12 PM Kentaro Hayashi wrote: > > Here is the reproducible code. The failure does not reproduce on the Debian arm64 porterbox amdahl. In the code above, I removed the 'print $future' statement and replaced $loop->await with 'say $future->get'. The result is