Bug#995492: lintian: Broken --fails-on=none as default never got reverted

2021-10-01 Thread Guillem Jover
Package: lintian Version: 2.77.0 Severity: serious Sigh, So the problematic --fail-on default change never got actually reverted as the patch applied in commit 3758bfafd5dd742c327f2312dac8e3a71b1f036e omitted the relevant part that would make it work. :( None of the previous arguments against th

Bug#995490: lintian: false positive python3-script-but-no-python3-dep with Depends: python3, seems to want python3:any instead

2021-10-01 Thread Simon McVittie
Package: lintian Version: 2.107.0 Severity: normal xdg-desktop-portal-tests has a python3 script. It also has "Depends: python3". This is now diagnosed as "python3-script-but-no-python3-dep"; looking at recent commits, Lintian seems to want it to depend on python3:any instead. I think that's inco

Bug#995446: lintian: don't emit hyphen-in-upstream-part-of-debian-changelog-version for R packages

2021-10-01 Thread Torrance, Douglas
On Fri 01 Oct 2021 08:51:28 AM EDT, Felix Lechner wrote: Hi Douglas, On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 4:51 AM Torrance, Douglas wrote: Would it be possible to avoid emitting this warning for R packages? Yes! We have a new facility for the purpose of granting summary exemptions to package groups. It

Bug#995446: lintian: don't emit hyphen-in-upstream-part-of-debian-changelog-version for R packages

2021-10-01 Thread Felix Lechner
Hi Douglas, On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 4:51 AM Torrance, Douglas wrote: > > Would it be possible to avoid emitting this warning for R packages? Yes! We have a new facility for the purpose of granting summary exemptions to package groups. It is called a screen. [1] As for your broader issue, I would

Bug#995446: lintian: don't emit hyphen-in-upstream-part-of-debian-changelog-version for R packages

2021-10-01 Thread Torrance, Douglas
Package: lintian Version: 2.106.1 X-Debbugs-Cc: dtorra...@piedmont.edu In R, unlike Debian, hyphens (-) and dots (.) are sorted equally for comparing version numbers, and it is standard practice upstream for hyphens to be used between the minor and patch numbers, e.g., x.y-z. The existence of th

Bug#918137: marked as done (lintian: skip-systemd-native-flag-missing-pre-depends info text typo)

2021-10-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 01 Oct 2021 08:55:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#918137: fixed in lintian 2.107.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #918137, regarding lintian: skip-systemd-native-flag-missing-pre-depends info text typo to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

lintian_2.107.0_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2021-10-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2021 08:28:20 + Source: lintian Architecture: source Version: 2.107.0 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Lintian Maintainers Changed-By: Chris Lamb Closes: 918137 968525 971707

Bug#994902: marked as done ("missing-dep-for-interpreter make" should not trigger on "make:any")

2021-10-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 01 Oct 2021 08:55:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#994902: fixed in lintian 2.107.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #994902, regarding "missing-dep-for-interpreter make" should not trigger on "make:any" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#995261: marked as done (lintian: non-standard-file-perm false positives for files in /etc/sudoers.d/ (missing "return"?))

2021-10-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 01 Oct 2021 08:55:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#995261: fixed in lintian 2.107.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #995261, regarding lintian: non-standard-file-perm false positives for files in /etc/sudoers.d/ (missing "return"?) to be marked as done. This

Bug#994689: marked as done (lintian: maintainer-manual-page false positive if according program is also not from upstream)

2021-10-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 01 Oct 2021 08:55:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#994689: fixed in lintian 2.107.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #994689, regarding lintian: maintainer-manual-page false positive if according program is also not from upstream to be marked as done. This me

Bug#994711: marked as done (lintian: empty-binary-package ignores "empty package" in package description)

2021-10-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 01 Oct 2021 08:55:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#994711: fixed in lintian 2.107.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #994711, regarding lintian: empty-binary-package ignores "empty package" in package description to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Bug#994414: marked as done (lintian(1) says --fails-on defaults to `error`, but looks like it's `none`)

2021-10-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 01 Oct 2021 08:55:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#994414: fixed in lintian 2.107.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #994414, regarding lintian(1) says --fails-on defaults to `error`, but looks like it's `none` to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#994793: marked as done (lintian: patch-system-but-direct-changes-in-diff false positive: Checks ../_.diff.gz even if not listed in ../__.changes)

2021-10-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 01 Oct 2021 08:55:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#994793: fixed in lintian 2.107.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #994793, regarding lintian: patch-system-but-direct-changes-in-diff false positive: Checks ../_.diff.gz even if not listed in ../__.changes to

Bug#994271: marked as done (lintian: superfluous-file-pattern should not be issued for Files-Excluded in debian/copyright)

2021-10-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 01 Oct 2021 08:55:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#994271: fixed in lintian 2.107.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #994271, regarding lintian: superfluous-file-pattern should not be issued for Files-Excluded in debian/copyright to be marked as done. This me

Bug#971707: marked as done (lintian: breakout-link has lots of false positives, in particular for non-FHS trees below /usr/lib)

2021-10-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 01 Oct 2021 08:55:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#971707: fixed in lintian 2.107.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #971707, regarding lintian: breakout-link has lots of false positives, in particular for non-FHS trees below /usr/lib to be marked as done. Th

Bug#968525: marked as done (lintian: breakout-link reported for /usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH) -> /lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH) symlinks)

2021-10-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 01 Oct 2021 08:55:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#968525: fixed in lintian 2.107.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #968525, regarding lintian: breakout-link reported for /usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH) -> /lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH) symlinks to be marked as do

Processing of lintian_2.107.0_amd64.changes

2021-10-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
lintian_2.107.0_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lintian_2.107.0.dsc lintian_2.107.0.tar.xz lintian_2.107.0_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

[Git][lintian/lintian] Pushed new tag 2.107.0

2021-10-01 Thread Chris Lamb (@lamby)
Chris Lamb pushed new tag 2.107.0 at lintian / lintian -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/tree/2.107.0 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.