Bug#1014083: Leaves many mldbm files in /tmp without cleanup

2022-06-29 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: lintian Version: 2.115.2 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org The current version of lintian seems to create numerous temporary files in /tmp/mldbm-elf-* and /tmp/mldbm-elf-by-member-* and while some of them disappear by the time lintian finishes, others remain around

Bug#1013946: lintian: wrongly report unknown-locale-code ber

2022-06-29 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi Tobias, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote: > The safest way for lintian would probably be to use ISO 639-3 as a source > for locale checking, because those codes represent an individual language. > The vast majority of program translations are into an individual language, > so the check seems

Bug#1013946: lintian: wrongly report unknown-locale-code ber

2022-06-29 Thread Dr. Tobias Quathamer
Am 28.06.22 um 02:31 schrieb Axel Beckert: Still would be happy about input from Toddy on this. :-) Hi all, thanks a lot for your research and insights ... I'm not an ISO expert, either, but from my reading and understanding the relationship between the standards (and the intended use) is

Bug#1007002: Lintian breaks existing lintian-overrides due to added []

2022-06-29 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Axel, Am Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 06:01:33PM +0200 schrieb Axel Beckert: > Andreas: Sorry if I was a bit too opposing because of assuming that > every DD uses Unstable by default. No need to be sorry, really not. I simply missed the point of that change. > (Actually I think the Dev Ref says >

Bug#1007002: Lintian breaks existing lintian-overrides due to added []

2022-06-29 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi again, Axel Beckert wrote: > Andreas Tille wrote: > > I'll start editing lintian-overrides then. > > Maybe wait a bit with that. Given Lucas' comment, I feel a bit more > urged to provide such a migration script. > > I will look into this for the next upload. No promises as of now, > though.

[Git][lintian/lintian] Pushed new branch migrate-overrides

2022-06-29 Thread Axel Beckert (@abe)
Axel Beckert pushed new branch migrate-overrides at lintian / lintian -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/tree/migrate-overrides You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.

Processed: Bug#1007002 marked as pending in lintian

2022-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1007002 [lintian] lintian: transition to "pointed hints" has invalidated many overrides Added tag(s) pending. -- 1007002: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1007002 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Processed: Bug#1014057 marked as pending in lintian

2022-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1014057 [lintian] lintian man page: bad default for --color Added tag(s) pending. -- 1014057: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1014057 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1007002: Lintian breaks existing lintian-overrides due to added []

2022-06-29 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi Lucas, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Just a note that since the last version of lintian to migrate to testing > was 2.111 (which was also the last one to be backported to stable), some > of us might not have updated since 2.111 and might be hit by changes > that happened since then. Oh, right!

Bug#1007002: Lintian breaks existing lintian-overrides due to added []

2022-06-29 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 29/06/22 at 15:49 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > Correct, except that it happened for quite a while (7 months at least) > and was (and maybe still is — see below) a continuous transition. It > is present since at least 2.114.0 from November 2021. According to the > git history, the implementation

Bug#1014057: lintian man page: bad default for --color

2022-06-29 Thread Jakub Wilk
Package: lintian Version: 2.115.1 Severity: minor The Lintian man page says the default for --color is "never". It is actually "auto" since Lintian 2.5.22: + [NT] Let --color default to "auto". -- Jakub Wilk

Bug#1007002: Lintian breaks existing lintian-overrides due to added []

2022-06-29 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Samuel and Axel, Am Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 04:10:49PM +0200 schrieb Samuel Thibault: > Axel Beckert, le mer. 29 juin 2022 15:49:11 +0200, a ecrit: > > > I consider these [] not helpful […] no visible advantage. OK, thanks for making the advantages visible to me then. I'll start editing

Bug#1007002: Lintian breaks existing lintian-overrides due to added []

2022-06-29 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Axel Beckert, le mer. 29 juin 2022 15:49:11 +0200, a ecrit: > > I consider these [] not helpful […] no visible advantage. > > The advantage is to clearly mark what is a file with potentially a > line number in the output of lintian so that further processors like > the lintian website can

Bug#1007002: Lintian breaks existing lintian-overrides due to added []

2022-06-29 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi Andreas, Andreas Tille wrote: > I realised that lintian (at least) starting with version 2.115.1 (may be > earlier) wraps file names into [] which breaks existing > lintian-overrides. Correct, except that it happened for quite a while (7 months at least) and was (and maybe still is — see

Re: Lintian breaks existing lintian-overrides due to added []

2022-06-29 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 02:49:35PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > I realised that lintian (at least) starting with version 2.115.1 (may be > earlier) wraps file names into [] which breaks existing > lintian-overrides. Random example: > > >

Processed: unarchiving 974641, reopening 974641

2022-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # I agree with Lucas, not with Felix > unarchive 974641 Bug #974641 {Done: Felix Lechner } [lintian] lintian: classification tag for test suite Unarchived Bug 974641 > reopen 974641 Bug #974641 {Done: Felix Lechner } [lintian] lintian:

Lintian breaks existing lintian-overrides due to added []

2022-06-29 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I realised that lintian (at least) starting with version 2.115.1 (may be earlier) wraps file names into [] which breaks existing lintian-overrides. Random example: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/biomaj3-user/-/blob/master/debian/lintian-overrides now becomes invalid by lintian

Bug#1014045: source-is-missing doesn't seem to understand docbook

2022-06-29 Thread Christoph Berg
Package: lintian Version: 2.115.1 Severity: normal The latest lintian versions are throwing a lot of these errors on postgresql-15: E: postgresql-15 source: source-is-missing [doc/src/sgml/html/acronyms.html] N: The source of the following file is missing. Lintian checked a few possible paths