Hi Holger,
On 22/08/22 at 11:34 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> hi,
>
> first: it's great that lintian is under active development again!
> second: it's great that UDD now has up2date information from current lintian
> runs!
>
> (I've bcc:ed abe@d.o and lucas@d.o out of courtesy, so they see
hi,
first: it's great that lintian is under active development again!
second: it's great that UDD now has up2date information from current lintian
runs!
(I've bcc:ed abe@d.o and lucas@d.o out of courtesy, so they see this but
won't get every reply cc:ed.)
Now my questions, as raised on
Source: lintian
Version: 2.115-2
I use this packaging workflow where I have fetched an upstream git remote:
gbp pq import
git cherry-pick -x 123456
gbp pq export
This creates Debian patches that have this line
(cherry picked from commit 12345)
Although this doesn't strictly follow DEP-3, I
On Mon, 2022-08-22 at 09:59:34 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Guillem Jover wrote:
> > The bin-sbin-mismatch triggers false positives on partial matches such
> > as /usr/bin/dpkg-www and /usr/sbin/dpkg-www-installer, or
> > /usr/bin/dpkg and /usr/sbin/dpkg-fsys-usrunmess.
>
> Urgs. Thanks! Nice
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + moreinfo
Bug #1017530 [lintian] lintian: dwz generated file false positive
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> user lintian-ma...@debian.org
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> usertag -1 + false-positive
Unknown command or malformed arguments to
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Control: user lintian-ma...@debian.org
Control: usertag -1 + false-positive
Hi Bastien,
thanks for the bug report. Unfortunately I don't get what actually is
the bug. Can you be a bit more verbose? Some questions below.
Bastien Roucariès wrote:
> I have an interesting
Package: lintian
Version: 2.115.2
Severity: normal
src:pysdl2 has python3-all in its Build-Depends, and an autopkgtest
that is listed in d/tests/control with "Depends: @builddeps@" and
invokes py3versions -s.
Expected result: Lintian sees that the test has a dependency on
python3-all via
Hi Holger,
Holger Levsen wrote:
> first: it's great that lintian is under active development again!
Sorry for that month of silence. This was two weeks of holidays where
I did way less for Debian than I expected plus some pre- and
post-holiday stress.
I just restarted working on Lintian this
Axel Beckert pushed new branch fix-cruft-perlcritic at lintian / lintian
--
View it on GitLab:
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/tree/fix-cruft-perlcritic
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.
Hi,
[Dropping the RFH bug report from Cc, at least for now.]
Axel Beckert wrote:
> More test suite failures / How to run the test suite
>
>
> Additionally the test suite now fails due to
> lib/Lintian/Check/Cruft.pm no more being tidy:
>
>
Hi Guillem,
Guillem Jover wrote:
> Control: tag -1 patch
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/414
>
> On Mon, 2022-06-27 at 15:14:10 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > I'd have to re-dig all this. I might just try to provide
Hi Guillem,
Guillem Jover wrote:
> The bin-sbin-mismatch triggers false positives on partial matches such
> as /usr/bin/dpkg-www and /usr/sbin/dpkg-www-installer, or
> /usr/bin/dpkg and /usr/sbin/dpkg-fsys-usrunmess.
Urgs. Thanks! Nice catch!
>
> This is due to the check in
12 matches
Mail list logo
