Processed: Re: Bug#991533: lintian: please forget about required-field Standards-Version for udeb packages

Processing control commands: > tag -1 patch Bug #991533 [lintian] lintian: please forget about required-field Standards-Version for udeb packages Bug #988911 [lintian] regression: claims that udebs require a Standards-Version header Added tag(s) patch. Added tag(s) patch. -- 988911:

Bug#991533: lintian: please forget about required-field Standards-Version for udeb packages

Control: tag -1 patch Cyril Brulebois (2023-01-23): > Can we please finally drop those checks? You'll find above the green > light from Sean regarding lintian's possibly moving ahead of changes in > Policy; since December, 5.6.11 even ends with: > > udebs and source packages that only

Bug#991533: lintian: please forget about required-field Standards-Version for udeb packages

Hi lintian maintainers, Cyril Brulebois (2022-04-13): > Sean Whitton (2021-08-12): > > On Tue 27 Jul 2021 at 04:08AM +02, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > > > > Whatever happens on the debian-policy front (if anything), I'd prefer if > > > lintian would stop emitting those errors on its own. It

Bug#1014885: marked as done (Conflict: unknown-field Go-Import-Path x missing-xs-go-import-path-for-golang-package)

Your message dated Mon, 23 Jan 2023 10:31:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1014885: fixed in lintian 2.116.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1014885, regarding Conflict: unknown-field Go-Import-Path x missing-xs-go-import-path-for-golang-package to be marked as done. This means

Processed: Re: Bug#1029479: lintian: reject packages with debmake default description

Processing control commands: > tag -1 + confirmed Bug #1029479 [lintian] lintian: reject packages with debmake default description Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1029479: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1029479 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1029479: lintian: reject packages with debmake default description

Control: tag -1 + confirmed Hi Paul, Paul Wise wrote: > yq was just accepted into Debian with a completely bogus description > that is the default from the debmake automatic package generator. Right, noticed that, too. Writing a bug report about that was on my TODO list. So thanks for filing

Bug#1027744: marked as done (spare-manual-page triggers for binaries in /usr/libexec)

Your message dated Mon, 23 Jan 2023 10:31:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1027744: fixed in lintian 2.116.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1027744, regarding spare-manual-page triggers for binaries in /usr/libexec to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#976636: marked as done (false positive error for pypy packages (package-contains-documentation-outside-usr-share-doc))

Your message dated Mon, 23 Jan 2023 10:31:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#976636: fixed in lintian 2.116.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #976636, regarding false positive error for pypy packages (package-contains-documentation-outside-usr-share-doc) to be marked as done. This

Bug#997987: marked as done (lintian: false positive: package-contains-documentation-outside-usr-share-doc [...]/CMakeLists.txt)

Your message dated Mon, 23 Jan 2023 10:31:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#997987: fixed in lintian 2.116.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #997987, regarding lintian: false positive: package-contains-documentation-outside-usr-share-doc [...]/CMakeLists.txt to be marked as done.

Bug#1029177: marked as done (lintian: Update Lintian User's Manual wrt. to Pointed Hints format)

Your message dated Mon, 23 Jan 2023 10:31:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1029177: fixed in lintian 2.116.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1029177, regarding lintian: Update Lintian User's Manual wrt. to Pointed Hints format to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

lintian_2.116.1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 03:32:04 +0100 Source: lintian Architecture: source Version: 2.116.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Lintian Maintainers

Bug#1029055: marked as done (lintian: Lintian does not recognize the AppStream's metainfo.xml MIT license is the same as Debian's Expat license)

Your message dated Mon, 23 Jan 2023 10:31:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1029055: fixed in lintian 2.116.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1029055, regarding lintian: Lintian does not recognize the AppStream's metainfo.xml MIT license is the same as Debian's Expat license to be

Processing of lintian_2.116.1_source.changes

lintian_2.116.1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lintian_2.116.1.dsc lintian_2.116.1.tar.xz lintian_2.116.1_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

[Git][lintian/lintian][master] Release and upload as 2.116.1 to unstable

Axel Beckert pushed to branch master at lintian / lintian Commits: 0a783122 by Axel Beckert at 2023-01-23T03:37:24+01:00 Release and upload as 2.116.1 to unstable - - - - - 1 changed file: - debian/changelog Changes: = debian/changelog

[Git][lintian/lintian] Pushed new tag 2.116.1

Axel Beckert pushed new tag 2.116.1 at lintian / lintian -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/tree/2.116.1 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.