* Niels Thykier [130320 16:25]:
> On 2013-03-09 23:30, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> > missing-debian-source-format is currently hidden away as
> > informational, although the large number of packages with
> > this defect makes it almost impossible to switch dpkg-source
> &g
the non-existance of that file means dpkg-source will not
check anything but for example happily create native packages
just because a .orig.tar file is missing, making this a very
newbie-unfriendly situation).
Please switching back to W. Patch attached for convenience.
Bernhard R. Link
Attached is the patch split in two parts and the description
of the proposed vcs-field-not-canonical extended a bit.
Bernhard R. Link
>From 61213518213d15da67767d2fb6287f06a25dddca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Bernhard R. Link"
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 13:20:24 +0200
Subj
* Jakub Wilk [120716 14:19]:
> * Bernhard R. Link , 2012-07-16, 13:30:
> >+Tag: vcs-field-not-canonical
> >+Severity: minor
> >+Certainty: possible
> >+Info: The VCS-* field contains an uncanonical URI. Please update to use
> >+ the current canonical URI instea
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.10
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
>From 65a8aa5012589e7ca44eaa51c4adc7874dcbfefa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Bernhard R. Link"
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 13:20:24 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] c/fields: check vcs URLs for unexpected spaces and old URLs
add
s and my perl
skills could be better, I'm not setting the patch tag.
Hochachtungsvoll,
Bernhard R. Link
Index: checks/upstreamtar.desc
===
--- checks/upstreamtar.desc (Revision 0)
+++ checks/upstreamtar.desc (Revision
h"
targets.
But I agree a general warning is nice, though it should be easily
circumventable. (Though I guess it always is via renaming the patches
dir to something else).
Hochachtungsvoll,
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dpkg running is newer than from 1999).
Hochachtungsvoll,
Bernhard R. Link
diff -rup lintian-1.23.45/checks/control-files lintian-1.23.45patched/checks/control-files
--- lintian-1.23.45/checks/control-files 2008-01-03 03:03:56.0 +0100
+++ lintian-1.23.45patched/checks/control-files
/Blocks" \
icon="/usr/share/pixmaps/cuyo.xpm" title="cuyo" command="/usr/games/cuyo"
cuyo_2.~-1.0-1_sparc.deb
?package(cuyo):needs="X11" section="Games/Blocks" \
icon="/usr/share/pixmaps/cuyo.xpm" title="cuyo" command="/usr/games/cuyo"
Is it possible that the scripts responsible for generating the contents of
the website are somehow using an old i386 version of the binary or
something like that?
Hochachtungsvoll,
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
,
Bernhard R. Link
--
"Never contain programs so few bugs, as when no debugging tools are available!"
Niklaus Wirth
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10 matches
Mail list logo