are wrongly reported.
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 15/02/2022 à 23:28, Felix Lechner a écrit :
Thank you for the advice. The value was adjusted back to the previous value:
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/commit/11926263c63e9286339f49dbbee55dd45982b621
It looks good, thank you.
Emmanuel Bourg
Felix.
I think max-bytecode-version should remain at 56, because Java 11 is
still the default version. Once the transition to Java 17 is completed
this could be changed to 61. Java 18 isn't a LTS release, so 62 will
never be used.
Emmanuel Bourg
to
the latest one please (i.e. Java 19, with bytecode version 63).
Thank you,
Emmanuel Bourg
eserve the compatibility with the
layout of the old src:eclipse package (which dates back to 2002, it was
replaced two years ago by a set of smaller packages) :
https://packages.debian.org/stretch/amd64/eclipse-platform/filelist
https://packages.debian.org/stretch/amd64/eclipse-rcp/filelist
Emmanuel Bourg
to architecture independent jar files.
Emmanuel Bourg
to migrate 1000+ packages
to a different address.
Could you please exclude this address from the ones reported by this tag?
Thank you,
Emmanuel Bourg
On 29/12/2019 17:50, Felix Lechner wrote:
> Done with:
>
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/ca5adad9cb21805b871a9f2e6cdd30b8bdb0246c
>
> Thanks for helping to make Lintian better.
Thank you for the quick fix!
Emmanuel Bourg
or pedantic, and adjust the
description to explain the suffix is optional.
Emmanuel Bourg
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
On 24/12/2017 21:33, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Do you have any up-to-date false-positives? The ones you listed
> are now not showing up for me :)
cronometer is another example. Lintian reports two jar files that only
contain xml files and no compiled Java files:
P:
uctions, so
maybe rename the tag to "package-installs-java-class-files".
- verify if the .class files are really Java class files (by checking
the 0xCAFEBABE header, this will avoid false positives like
apertium-eo-fr and grass-core).
Emmanuel Bourg
[1] https://lintian.debian.org/tags/package-installs-java-bytecode.html
Le 8/03/2017 à 10:19, Markus Koschany a écrit :
> I suggest to remove this Lintian tag or lower the severity from
> warning to info.
+1 for lowering the severity to info.
Emmanuel Bourg
apache-log4j2 is another example, it contains an IntellijSettings.jar
file with IDE settings (plain text files, no compiled classes).
https://sources.debian.net/src/apache-log4j2/2.2-1/src/ide/Intellij/13/
maven-invoker-plugin is a good example of a package containing
empty jar files. The source tarball ships with 3 jar files used
by the integration tests, they contain only a MANIFEST.MF file
and no compiled class:
ebourg@icare:~/packaging/maven-invoker-plugin$ tar -tf
many packages don't strictly adhere
to the Java policy on this point (for example liblog4j1.2-java vs
/usr/share/java/log4j-1.2.jar) and I'm not under the impression it's
causing such a havoc.
Emmanuel Bourg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
this
warning.
Thank you,
Emmanuel Bourg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/20150624153133.4316.17930.report...@icare.ariane-software.com
Le 27/05/2015 15:41, Jan Henke a écrit :
I think gcj serves one single purpose only at this point in time:
Bootstrapping during the OpenJDK build.
This is no longer true with OpenJDK 8 unfortunately, Java 7 is now required.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
their
dependencies are still compatible with the Java 5 API. But as Niels
stated it's impossible to keep the Java 5 compatibility everywhere (Java
9 will even be unable to generate Java 5 bytecode [1]).
Emmanuel Bourg
[1] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/182
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ
Le 26/05/2015 15:58, Markus Koschany a écrit :
I assume all members of the team agree with this change.
Yes that makes sense.
Emmanuel Bourg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
It looks like this new lintian check gives false positives when the
License field contains or:
License: CDDL or GPL-2
W: jenkins source: space-in-std-shortname-in-dep5-copyright cddl or
gpl-2 (paragraph at line 99)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.22.1
Severity: normal
Hi,
Could you please support the Java 8 class version in the
unknown-java-class-version check? OpenJDK 8 is being packaged and
lintian complains about the new class version (52 for Java 8, Java 7
used 51)
Thank you,
Emmanuel Bourg
The package contains Java class files with a minimum requirement on the
listed Java version. This Java version is not supported by the default
JVM in Debian and is therefore likely to be a mistake.
Emmanuel Bourg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
22 matches
Mail list logo
