Re: RFC: Profile as check/tag loader

2012-01-22 Thread Jeremiah C. Foster
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:03:58PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi, Hi, > I have been coding a bit and I got an idea that I would like to share > before just merging my branch (at [1]). I originally wanted to start on > the vendor-specific data files, but it turned into some rather large > str

Re: [SCM] Debian package checker branch, master, updated. 2.5.2-11-g39af0d7

2011-08-13 Thread Jeremiah C. Foster
On Aug 13, 2011, at 23:57, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2011-08-13 23:13, Russ Allbery wrote: >> "Niels Thykier" writes: >> >>>Perlcritic cleaned c/standards-version >> >>> -our $STANDARDS = Lintian::Data->new('standards-version/release-dates', >>> '\s+'); >>> +my $STANDARDS = Lintian::Data-

Re: Example of proposed pod usage (with patch)

2011-08-13 Thread Jeremiah C. Foster
On Aug 13, 2011, at 19:08, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2011-08-13 13:21, Jeremiah C. Foster wrote: >>> BTW, I committed your original README.developers with a few >>>> changes[1], so your patch would probably not apply cleanly. >> thanks for your changes, they cla

Re: Example of proposed pod usage (with patch)

2011-08-13 Thread Jeremiah C. Foster
On Aug 13, 2011, at 13:06, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2011-08-12 22:34, Jeremiah C. Foster wrote: >> Here is an example of how I think pod might work; > > Hey, > > I appreciate the idea of improving the documentation and making > (htmlified-version of) README.developers a

Example of proposed pod usage (with patch)

2011-08-12 Thread Jeremiah C. Foster
Here is an example of how I think pod might work; --- README.developers |6 - frontend/lintian | 60 ++-- 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.developers b/README.developers index dc1edd0..ca4b206 100644

Re: [Draft] Bits from the lintian maintainers

2011-08-12 Thread Jeremiah C. Foster
On Aug 12, 2011, at 21:36, Jeremiah Foster wrote: > > I've got a question regarding the various lintian modules. I'm a command line > person and often use tools like perldoc to read the documentation that is in > with code. Lintian does seem to use I meant "doesn't" of course. :} > plain old

Re: Vendor-based customization of Lintian (or profiles)

2011-04-19 Thread Jeremiah C. Foster
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 06:14:25PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi > > Considering that #513663 will be closed in 2.5.0~rc3, I figured it was > time to start a new branch. XD w00t! > I was considering to do either Vendor-based customizati