I haven't touched lintian.d.o in many years now, so please feel free to drop me
from the list.
If you do find that you have high bus factor on that afterwards, likewise,
don't hesitate to let me know.
Na 6. kolovoza 2017. 12:13:00 CEST, Niels Thykier wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have gone through the memb
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 12:57:28AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > > And, why are non-free and contrib not checked?
> >
> > No particular reason.
>
> Since most policy (and most potential-for-mistakes) applies to non-free
> and contrib too, any objections to trying to enable that?
Dunno.
On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 11:42:55PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> How does lintian.debian.org work? Who maintains it (this list according
> to the contact info)? Who updates the system?
I do.
> And, why are non-free and contrib not checked?
No particular reason.
> It looks like some perl
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 02:21:53AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> In order to effectively change lintian to a group maintained package, I
> suggest the following patch.
Yeah, but I'd prefer to have Colin Watson or another more 'senior' developer
look over the upload before you do guys it. N
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 02:07:25PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > > On that website there are only flat lintian tarballs, no CVS
> > > repositories. Don't you have a CVS repository?
> >
> > Only the one on cvs.debian.org, and there was no point in committing to that
> > after shaleh had d
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 03:54:24AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > By the way, Josip, already had time for getting your CVS repositories
> > somewhere online? It isn't hurting lintian-by-subversion development as
> > histories can be glued together, but would be neat to have.
Please don't Cc: me on this list, I'm subscribed.
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 10:34:00PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > > By the way, Josip, already had time for getting your CVS repositories
> > > somewhere online? It isn't hurting lintian-by-subversion development as
> > > histories can be
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 01:57:19AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> By the way, Josip, already had time for getting your CVS repositories
> somewhere online? It isn't hurting lintian-by-subversion development as
> histories can be glued together, but would be neat to have.
Actually I haven't
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 04:43:56AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > > I just created a subversion repository with the latest lintian release
> > > in it.
> >
> > We need to convert the CVS repository to it, merge in the past releases
> > (I have tarballs from all but two or three of them, S
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 02:37:16PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> I just created a subversion repository with the latest lintian release
> in it.
We need to convert the CVS repository to it, merge in the past releases
(I have tarballs from all but two or three of them, Shaleh forwarded them
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 09:36:49AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> Hi! Can you please put a note on lintian.d.o's home page as to how
> often the database is updated? I was surprised to see that it had been
> three weeks since the previous run.
Err, it's updated daily, except when a person that shal
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 01:49:58PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > setuid-binary usr/lib/pt_chown 4755 root/root is intentional in libc*
> >
> > statically-linked-binary ./sbin/ldconfig is intentional.
> >
> > The lintian -iIv output sais to email this address. If these should be
> > in the
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 02:57:15PM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
> It's been quite a long time that the lintian.d.o webpage has not been
> updated with an uptodate version of lintian. Are there any problem
> with that ?
No, I'm simply busy and no other developer showed active interest.
I'll upgrade i
On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 11:56:55AM +1000, Anand Kumria wrote:
> > > Considering the large number of packages listed at
> > > http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tnewer-standards-version.html>
> > >
> > > I think a newer version of lintian needs to be installed.
> >
> > Oops, totally forgot about th
On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 08:31:12PM +1000, Anand Kumria wrote:
> Considering the large number of packages listed at
> http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tnewer-standards-version.html>
>
> I think a newer version of lintian needs to be installed.
Oops, totally forgot about that. I've replaced 1.22.5
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 09:04:36PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > on http://lintian.debian.org/reports I found that some of my packages fail
> > this lintian check:
> >
> > E: tkx8.3: shell-script-fails-syntax-check ./usr/bin/tclhelp8.3
> >
> > The scri
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 08:00:53PM +0100, Massimo Dal Zotto wrote:
> on http://lintian.debian.org/reports I found that some of my packages fail
> this lintian check:
>
> E: tkx8.3: shell-script-fails-syntax-check ./usr/bin/tclhelp8.3
>
> The script /usr/bin/tclhelp8.3 is started by /bin/sh as
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:22:57PM +1100, Steve Kowalik wrote:
> > > /etc/chrony/chrony.keys contains a password and therefor must be 640.
> > In Linda, I've fixed the check so that she doesn't complain if a filename
> > that contains '.key{s,}' has different permissions.
>
> Sigh. Linda doesn't e
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 11:33:00AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > The current lintian version doesn't know the last version of
> > > policy[1]. Please fix this when release a new version.
> > >
> > > 1. http://lintian.debian.org/reports/mOtavio_Salvador.html
> >
> > Actually it's already fixed,
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 01:44:00PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> The current lintian version doesn't know the last version of
> policy[1]. Please fix this when release a new version.
>
> 1. http://lintian.debian.org/reports/mOtavio_Salvador.html
Actually it's already fixed, it's just that the o
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 03:43:28PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> more and more Debian stuff is localized, and it would help to know
> when translations are outdated. For instance, developers could be
> warned that they have to run debconf-updatepo because they
> edited debian/templates files. Oth
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 03:34:24PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > That's probably why. I thought there was a problem because the link on the
> > package overview page http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=neil gives a
> > not found error when I click on the "Lintia
Hi,
I think I'm going to make a Lintian check for all packages that use
/usr/X11R6 except those where $source{$binpkg} eq "xfree86"
(half-pseudo-code there).
AIUI, Overfiend only added the imake exception into policy so that less
packages need immediate fixing (policy-is-not-a-stick policy :), no
Hi,
After haggling with the code to check the diffs for a few hours, I just
noticed that the original report makes no sense: the config.* files cannot
be removed by the diff, because dpkg-source simply ignores file deletions!
I'll remove the grossly overengineered code from lintian that was suppo
On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 02:58:18PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Anyone have a clue as to how to fix bug #148548?
>
> Change /\bmknod\b/ to something like /\bmknod(?:\s|$)/?
Why $ ? Invoking mknod without parameters doesn't sound like normal use...
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness
Hi,
I believe I've cleaned up the last of the visible rough edges in the code
that updates the Lintian lab incrementally. That means that I no longer have
to do the almost 8 hour long clean check every time, but instead only check
the packages that changed from what we already had, which usually t
Hi,
Anyone have a clue as to how to fix bug #148548?
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 03:13:38PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> > > As seen on debian-devel recently...
> > >
> > > I would like to request a new check from the lint tools, against source
> > > packages; the 'debian/rules' file should *not* have a trailing space after
> > > the "#! /usr/bin/make -f"
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 12:31:39PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> As seen on debian-devel recently...
>
> I would like to request a new check from the lint tools, against source
> packages; the 'debian/rules' file should *not* have a trailing space after
> the "#! /usr/bin/make -f".
You mean there's
Hi,
Just trolling for traffic... :)
We have a new mailing list now to discuss the maintenance of Debian
lint-like tools -- namely lintian and linda, but anything else that's
related is on topic as well.
It's called debian-lint-maint, and you can subscribe to it the normal way,
via [EMAIL PROTECT
30 matches
Mail list logo
