Package: lintian
Version: 2.117.0
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
I'm packaging python-pyelftools 0.31 and lintian fails due to files
used for testing, because of non-utf8 characters.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
Package: lintian
Version: 2.66.0
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
when preparing upload of brotli, lintian issues a warning runtime-test-file-
uses-supported-python-versions-without-python-all-build-depends.
I've tried to fix it by adding python-all:any, but in the end I believe the
issue is ca
On 25/10/15 12:12, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Hi Tomasz!
Hi Jakub,
>
> * Tomasz Buchert , 2015-10-25, 03:02:
> >Basically it looks as if dh-strip-nondeterminism/toolchain strips/will
> >strip so much that this tag may not be useful anymore.
>
> Well, not everybody uses dh-st
On 13/10/15 18:29, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Dear Bill,
>
> [...]
Hi guys,
I want to hijack this bug report to discuss the how the said tag
works. Note that *three* timestamps are considered here:
1) mtime *inside* .gz file (via RFC 1952, referred as to gz_mtime below)
2) mtime *of* the .gz fil
ests.
As far as I can tell the UTC/mtime handling should not break anything:
'time' was never exported or used anyway so a different format for it
should not make a difference. Switching to UTC *could* break
something, but I've run the testsuite and it looks fine.
Cheers,
Tomasz
From 4
1.13-1
ii xz-utils 5.1.1alpha+20120614-2+b3
-- no debconf information
>From fe16568353b96d04402903de80b1a91691aa2dac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tomasz Buchert
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 18:14:30 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] ignore tEH and tEh as well
---
checks/binaries.pm | 2 ++
On 12/02/14 11:03, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> Tomasz Buchert:
> > The reason I did it is that I wanted to keep "backwards compatibility".
> > Another solution is to drop "gzip-file-is-not-multi-arch-same-safe"
> > altogether, of course.
>
> The la
Hi Niels,
On 11/02/14 19:11, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2014-02-11 10:53, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
> [...]
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for working on it and producing a patch for it as well. :)
>
> > Currently, it will emit "package-contains-timestamped-gzip"
>
On 11/02/14 10:09, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> Tomasz Buchert:
> > > >> +Severity: normal
> > > >
> > > > It think it should be at most "wishlist", perhaps even "pedantic".
> > > >
> >
> > Let's make i
On 11/02/14 06:54, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2014-02-11 01:20, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > * Tomasz Buchert , 2014-02-11, 00:56:
> >> There is an ongoing project to build reproducible deps (see
> >> https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds). One of tasks is to update
&g
formation
>From f389948be4631df98cbf1a140857a541b76ffe77 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tomasz Buchert
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 23:53:37 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] added reproducibility checker
---
checks/reproducibility.desc| 13 ++
checks/reproducibility.pm
11 matches
Mail list logo
