On 2023-02-05, Axel Beckert wrote:
> While running Lintian's testsuite on a much faster system compared to
> my Sid amd64 running development workstation, I noticed the following
> test suite failure when running "private/runtests" or trying to build
> the package on a more modern and more
Package: lintian
Version: 2.99.0
Severity: normal
The URL referenced in systemd-service-file-uses-deprecated-syslog-facility:
Refer to https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/NEWS#L101 for
details.
This references a changing file by line number, and it tends to get new
changes at the
Package: lintian
Version: 2.99.0
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: r...@defaultvalue.org
The missing-dep-for-interpreter references old guile versions but not
the newer versions:
missing-dep-for-interpreter guile => guile | guile-2.0 | guile-2.2
guile-2.0 is not currently in bullseye due to RC
On 2019-11-14, Chris Lamb wrote:
>> It would be nice if lintian checked for the presence of a .buildinfo
>> file when processing a .changes file.
>
> I'm obviously sold on the idea of .buildinfo files but what error or
> mistake might such a missing file imply on behalf of the developer?
I'm not
Package: lintian
Version: 2.33.0
Severity: wishlist
It would be nice if lintian checked for the presence of a .buildinfo
file when processing a .changes file.
For a stretch goal, it would be nice if it also checked if the
.buildinfo file was signed. :)
live well,
vagrant
signature.asc
ges, as
there are bug reports requesting to migrate to 2.0 on a handful of
packages, for example:
https://bugs.debian.org/885188
Maybe that should be a lintian check as well?
live well,
vagrant
From 9e4e6219b29fc1f246e5c1216fa9476f612fafb1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vagrant Cascadian
D
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.4
Severity: normal
since epoptes 0.3.2, lintian will exit 1 when checking epoptes, but produces no
policy violations or other warnings or errors... you can download the .dsc from
your favorite debian mirror, and:
lintian epoptes_0.4.2-1.dsc ; echo $?
1
running with
Package: lintian
Version: 2.4.1~bpo50+1
Severity: normal
if i build sdm with dependencies on dash, i get this:
E: sdm: depends-on-essential-package-without-using-version depends: dash
if i build sdm without any dependencies on dash, i get this:
E: sdm: missing-dep-for-interpreter dash =
Package: lintian
Version: 2.3.4~bpo50+1
Severity: normal
the new lintian check empty-binary-packge should skip udebs, as it is not
uncommon for a udeb to only contain a postinst script and dependencies, and it
would seem silly to flag them all as metapackages.
thanks!
live well,
vagrant
--
Package: lintian
Version: 2.3.1
Severity: minor
i get several lintian warnings with regards to the spelling of useable:
W: qemu-user-static: spelling-error-in-changelog useable usable
according to wordnet, at least, useable and usable are synonyms of each
other.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:56:33PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Vagrant Cascadian vagrant+debianb...@freegeek.org writes:
both education-desktop-other and ltsp-client are metapackages, or nearly
so, containing only standard /usr/share/doc files, lintian overrides
...snip...
how does
11 matches
Mail list logo
