On 07/07/2015 04:15 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 06/07/2015 06:36, tony mancill a écrit :
>
>> This warning is useful because
>> some components of the Debian Java toolchain fail when JAR files don't
>> comply with the naming policy.
>
> Hi Tony,
>
>
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.31
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
Please consider adding the attached check for JAR names that are
compliant with the Debian Java Policy. This warning is useful because
some components of the Debian Java toolchain fail when JAR files don't
comply with the namin
On 05/26/2015 11:49 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2015-05-27 08:09, tony mancill wrote:
[...]
>> However, couldn't we use versioned build-deps on default-jdk + the
>> virtual runtime dependency for the binary package to accomplish the same
>> effect? For any softwa
On Tue, 26 May 2015 17:54:17 +0200 Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2015-05-26 17:25, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 May 2015, Niels Thykier wrote:
> >
> >> I agree that the is a good idea to clarify this. My personal
> >> recommendation is to declare that:
> >>
> >> * gcj-jdk is not considered
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/25/2010 10:13 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Jari Aalto , 2010-05-21, 15:28:
>> With debian/rules file like this:
>>
>>%
>> dh $@
>>
>> The calls flow through "dh_pysupport". Unfortunately that does nothing
>> if debian/control::Depands li
Package: lintian
Version: 2.4.1
Severity: normal
Here is some extra infomation related to Jari's bug report. The issue was
with a simple package for architecture all that contains a python
script. Built on a normal system with python-support installed, dh_pysupport
is called and the ${python:Dep
6 matches
Mail list logo
