On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 19:23 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 11:59 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As far as I can see, it *is* in POSIX, which is what persuaded Herbert
to (albeit slowly) add it to dash.
Oh! Then the
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.46
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
dash (finally) gained support for the shell arithmetic construct $((var
+1)) with the upload of 0.5.4-3 in December 2007 (see #329025).
As lenny contains a version of dash with the support, I've attached a
patch removing the
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.46
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
dash (finally) gained support for the shell arithmetic construct $((var
+1)) with the upload of 0.5.4-3 in December 2007 (see #329025).
As lenny contains a version of dash with the
On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 11:31 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
dash (finally) gained support for the shell arithmetic construct $((var
+1)) with the upload of 0.5.4-3 in December 2007 (see #329025).
As lenny contains a version of dash with the
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As far as I can see, it *is* in POSIX, which is what persuaded Herbert
to (albeit slowly) add it to dash.
Oh! Then the comment now makes sense to me, and by all means we should
remove this check. Thank you very much for this; I hadn't realized that
On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 11:59 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As far as I can see, it *is* in POSIX, which is what persuaded Herbert
to (albeit slowly) add it to dash.
Oh! Then the comment now makes sense to me, and by all means we should
remove this
6 matches
Mail list logo