On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 21:17 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 15:02 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > 2009/1/21 Adam D. Barratt :
> > > I haven't applied the lib/Checker.pm change, because as far as I can see
> > > Checker::register is never actually called. I've left the code
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 15:02 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> 2009/1/21 Adam D. Barratt :
> [...]
> >
> > I haven't applied the lib/Checker.pm change, because as far as I can see
> > Checker::register is never actually called. I've left the code in place
> > for the moment in case I've missed someth
2009/1/21 Adam D. Barratt :
[...]
>
> I haven't applied the lib/Checker.pm change, because as far as I can see
> Checker::register is never actually called. I've left the code in place
> for the moment in case I've missed something.
I did not check whether the functions calling fail where actually
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 14:02 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> While messing with the test suite I found a missing use Utils in
> Lintian::Collect::Source. Attached mbox includes a patch fixing that missing
> use and another one that does the same but to other two .pms where it was
> missing as we
Package: lintian
Version: 2.1.6
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi,
While messing with the test suite I found a missing use Utils in
Lintian::Collect::Source. Attached mbox includes a patch fixing that missing
use and another one that does the same but to other two .pms where it was
missing as wel
5 matches
Mail list logo
