Bug#516067: lintian: false positives when checking the same package version from different archs

2009-02-21 Thread Russ Allbery
Raphael Geissert writes: > -v isn't helpful at all, only -d is a bit more, but the issue is a bit > obscure. Attached is the output of -d on just a subset of the packages. This is why I hate the Perl coding style that uses /o on regexes. It produces some horribly obscure errors that are almost

Bug#516067: lintian: false positives when checking the same package version from different archs

2009-02-21 Thread Raphael Geissert
Hi Frank, Nice to see you around :) 2009/2/21 Frank Lichtenheld : [...] > > lintian -v might be helpful. > -v isn't helpful at all, only -d is a bit more, but the issue is a bit obscure. Attached is the output of -d on just a subset of the packages. Cheers, -- Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintai

Bug#516067: lintian: false positives when checking the same package version from different archs

2009-02-21 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:54:34PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Package: lintian > Version: 2.2.5 > Severity: minor > > Hi all, > > $ for f in deb/*; do lintian $f; done > $ lintian deb/* > E: kgb: missing-dependency-on-libc needed by ./usr/bin/kgb > E: kgb: missing-dependency-on-libc needed

Bug#516067: lintian: false positives when checking the same package version from different archs

2009-02-18 Thread Raphael Geissert
Package: lintian Version: 2.2.5 Severity: minor Hi all, $ for f in deb/*; do lintian $f; done $ lintian deb/* E: kgb: missing-dependency-on-libc needed by ./usr/bin/kgb E: kgb: missing-dependency-on-libc needed by ./usr/bin/kgb E: kgb: missing-dependency-on-libc needed by ./usr/bin/kgb E: kgb: m