Niels,
Congratulations.
On 21/02/12 08:24, Niels Thykier wrote:
tags 651332 -moreinfo -unreproducible
thanks
On 2012-02-14 21:43, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
tag 651332 +unreproducible
thanks
Niels,
Sorry I did try to reporduce this in more isolated condition and
failed. All I can
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 651332 -moreinfo -unreproducible
Bug #651332 [lintian] lintian: unhelpful message if changes file not present
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
Bug #651332 [lintian] lintian: unhelpful message if changes file not present
Removed tag(s) unreproducible.
tags 651332 -moreinfo -unreproducible
thanks
On 2012-02-14 21:43, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> tag 651332 +unreproducible
> thanks
>
> Niels,
> Sorry I did try to reporduce this in more isolated condition and
> failed. All I can say is that it really happened but that the
> circumstances were
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 651332 +unreproducible
Bug #651332 [lintian] lintian: unhelpful message if changes file not present
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #651332 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
tag 651332 +unreproducible
thanks
Niels,
Sorry I did try to reporduce this in more isolated condition and
failed. All I can say is that it really happened but that the
circumstances were unnatural. (I was writing a script to generate a
Debian package and one of the tests was is the package
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 651332 + moreinfo
Bug #651332 [lintian] lintian: unhelpful message if changes file not present
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
651332: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug
tags 651332 + moreinfo
thanks
On 2011-12-08 23:00, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2011-12-08 22:57, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
>> Niels,
>> I think the following steps should reproduce it:
>
>> 1.) Take a package and run lintian against it.
>> 2.) Then delete the package and but still run lintian ag
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-12-08 22:57, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> Niels,
> I think the following steps should reproduce it:
>
> 1.) Take a package and run lintian against it.
> 2.) Then delete the package and but still run lintian against it.
>
>[...]
Sadly I s
Niels,
I think the following steps should reproduce it:
1.) Take a package and run lintian against it.
2.) Then delete the package and but still run lintian against it.
On 08/12/11 14:05, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2011-12-07 21:32, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
>> Package: lintian
>> Version: 2.
On 2011-12-07 21:32, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> Package: lintian
> Version: 2.5.4
> Severity: minor
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
Hi,
>* What led up to the situation?
> I have script that generates a private Debian package,
> builds it and runs lintian on the resulting changes file.
> I changed the
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.4
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
I have script that generates a private Debian package,
builds it and runs lintian on the resulting changes file.
I changed the n
11 matches
Mail list logo
