Bug#695345: Please add a check for gobject-introspection packages

2016-09-21 Thread Simon McVittie
Patch version 2 attached, now passes `debian/rules runtests`. On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 at 18:45:00 +, Niels Thykier wrote: > In checks/gir.desc: > +Reference: file:///usr/share/doc/gobject-introspection/policy.txt > ^ > > The field is "Ref" (consistent error) Fixed in v2, and I removed f

Bug#695345: Please add a check for gobject-introspection packages

2016-09-21 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Niels Thykier , 2016-09-21, 18:45: In checks/gir.desc: +Reference: file:///usr/share/doc/gobject-introspection/policy.txt ^ The field is "Ref" (consistent error) Also, our reference parser[*] knows about absolute pathnames, but not about file URLs, so let's make it: s,file://,, [

Bug#695345: Please add a check for gobject-introspection packages

2016-09-21 Thread Niels Thykier
Simon McVittie: > After getting this wrong in Flatpak, I have attached a proposed patch > for a new "gir" family of checks. > > [...] > > S > Thanks for creating a patch for this. :) At first glance, I only have a few minor tweaks/recommendations. :) In checks/gir.desc: +Reference: file:

Bug#695345: Please add a check for gobject-introspection packages

2016-09-21 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 21.09.2016 um 20:00 schrieb Simon McVittie: > After getting this wrong in Flatpak, I have attached a proposed patch > for a new "gir" family of checks. Nice co-incidence. I've just uploaded a new version of gobject-introspection with a small update to policy.txt, mentioning that multiarch path

Bug#695345: Please add a check for gobject-introspection packages

2016-09-21 Thread Simon McVittie
After getting this wrong in Flatpak, I have attached a proposed patch for a new "gir" family of checks. On Fri, 07 Dec 2012 at 12:10:54 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > 1/ Warn if the gir1.2-foo-X.Y package is not in section "introspection". W: gir1.2-bad: typelib-section-not-introspection usr/lib/

Bug#695345: Please add a check for gobject-introspection packages

2016-04-21 Thread Laurent Bigonville
On Fri, 07 Dec 2012 12:10:54 +0100 Michael Biebl wrote: > Hi, > > packages shipping gobject-introspection files should follow the mini > policy outlined at [1]. > > If they install the introspection files into the system paths, the > .typelib file should go into a gir1.2-foo-X.Y package. > The .

Bug#695345: Please add a check for gobject-introspection packages

2013-09-21 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2012-12-07 12:10, Michael Biebl wrote: > Package: lintian > Version: 2.5.10.2 > Severity: wishlist > > Hi, > Hi, Sorry, progress has been a bit slow in this bug. > packages shipping gobject-introspection files should follow the mini > policy outlined at [1]. > > If they install the introsp

Bug#695345: Please add a check for gobject-introspection packages

2012-12-07 Thread Michael Biebl
Package: lintian Version: 2.5.10.2 Severity: wishlist Hi, packages shipping gobject-introspection files should follow the mini policy outlined at [1]. If they install the introspection files into the system paths, the .typelib file should go into a gir1.2-foo-X.Y package. The .gir file should be