Bug#932870: lintian: check that there are some autopkgtests that don't have Restrictions: superficial

Package: lintian Version: 2.16.0 Severity: wishlist Suggested-by: dkg on #debci X-Debbugs-CC: Daniel Kahn Gillmor autopkgtests that have Restrictions: superficial do not provide significant test coverage. Please add a tag that is similar to the testsuite-autopkgtest-missing tag that is shown when

Bug#932870: lintian: check that there are some autopkgtests that don't have Restrictions: superficial

tags 932870 + moreinfo thanks Hi Paul, > autopkgtests that have Restrictions: superficial do not provide > significant test coverage. Please add a tag that is similar to the > testsuite-autopkgtest-missing tag that is shown when there are no > autopkgtests that are not marked as superficial. Par

Bug#932870: lintian: check that there are some autopkgtests that don't have Restrictions: superficial

Control: tags -1 - moreinfo On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 11:26 -0300, Chris Lamb wrote: > Parallel to my comment on #932862, what would you say to simply also > emitting testsuite-autopkgtest-missing in this case (and naturally > updating the description, etc). I would say that superficial tests do pro

Processed: Re: Bug#932870: lintian: check that there are some autopkgtests that don't have Restrictions: superficial

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 932870 + moreinfo Bug #932870 [lintian] lintian: check that there are some autopkgtests that don't have Restrictions: superficial Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 932870

Processed: Re: Bug#932870: lintian: check that there are some autopkgtests that don't have Restrictions: superficial

Processing control commands: > tags -1 - moreinfo Bug #932870 [lintian] lintian: check that there are some autopkgtests that don't have Restrictions: superficial Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 932870: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932870 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...