Re: new set of changes

2008-12-26 Thread Russ Allbery
Raphael Geissert writes: > Attached is a patch making the following changes: > * correctly parse line continuations > * avoid trying to perform any extra check on version 1 watch files > * know about versionmangle when checking if there is any mangling because of > $repack > * add line informatio

Re: new set of changes

2008-11-29 Thread Raphael Geissert
Raphael Geissert wrote: > Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 08:45:08PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Attached is a patch making the following changes: >>> * correctly parse line continuations >>> * avoid trying to perform any extra check on version 1 watc

Re: new set of changes

2008-09-10 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 09:02:52PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > I would prefer if you could split that up in separate patches for the > > separate issues. Also if you could submit it in git patch format or > > offer a public git repository to pull from that would ma

Re: new set of changes

2008-09-06 Thread Raphael Geissert
Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 08:45:08PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Attached is a patch making the following changes: >> * correctly parse line continuations >> * avoid trying to perform any extra check on version 1 watch files >> * know about versionmang

Re: new set of changes

2008-08-12 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 08:45:08PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Hi all, > > Attached is a patch making the following changes: > * correctly parse line continuations > * avoid trying to perform any extra check on version 1 watch files > * know about versionmangle when checking if there is any m

Re: new set of changes

2008-08-01 Thread Raphael Geissert
Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > I'm still not sure the reference is needed. I suspect that as a > maintainer presented with the tag I'd assume that uscan(1) contained > information on why my watch file shouldn't contain the version number it > does. Others' mileages may vary, of course. Well, if that'

Re: new set of changes

2008-07-31 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 20:05 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 20:45 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > > > A couple of comments from a very quick read-through. > > > >> +Tag: debian-watch-file-specifies-wrong-upstream-version > >> +Type: warning

Re: new set of changes

2008-07-31 Thread Raphael Geissert
Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 20:45 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > A couple of comments from a very quick read-through. > >> +Tag: debian-watch-file-specifies-wrong-upstream-version >> +Type: warning >> +Ref: uscan(1) > > References are intended to be pointers to further i

Re: new set of changes

2008-07-31 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 20:45 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: A couple of comments from a very quick read-through. > +Tag: debian-watch-file-specifies-wrong-upstream-version > +Type: warning > +Ref: uscan(1) References are intended to be pointers to further information about the issue lintian is r

new set of changes

2008-07-30 Thread Raphael Geissert
Hi all, Attached is a patch making the following changes: * correctly parse line continuations * avoid trying to perform any extra check on version 1 watch files * know about versionmangle when checking if there is any mangling because of $repack * add line information to some of the tags * attemp