Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> Currently, frontend/lintian sets the "package" for changes files to the
> basename of the changes file. That seems like a reasonable enough thing
> to stick with.
>
Sounds fair.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To U
Raphael Geissert writes:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Yeah, that works.
>> $pkg in this case would be set to the file name of the *.changes
>> file, I think. Probably doesn't really matter since a changes check
>> is unlikely to use it.
> What about the tags infrastructure? what "package" name wil
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Raphael Geissert writes:
>
>> Sure, now I see your point; but calling it a "package" disturbs me. I
>> just tried to think about a better name but all I can think about is
>> "file": "binary package file", "source package file",..., "changes
>> file", "dsc file", "tdeb pack
Raphael Geissert writes:
> Sure, now I see your point; but calling it a "package" disturbs me. I
> just tried to think about a better name but all I can think about is
> "file": "binary package file", "source package file",..., "changes
> file", "dsc file", "tdeb package file."
Yeah, that works
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Raphael Geissert writes:
>> Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> There isn't a reasonable place to put it in the lab, though. Consider
> the case of a *.changes file for a binary-only build where there's no
> source package and multiple binary packages.
Right.
>
> It's really a third
Raphael Geissert writes:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I'd be good with making this a real global, but it's hard to do that
>> in frontend/lintian. I've been thinking for a while that the right
>> solution is to move all the changes file checking into some other
>> format.
> I couldn't agree more. I
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Raphael Geissert writes:
>
>> Attached are a couple of patches against frontend/lintian.
>> I'm working on using a dependencies map to run the collection and check
>> scripts as soon as possible, more on it soon.
>
>> From: Raphael Geissert
>> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 16:31:4
Raphael Geissert writes:
> Attached are a couple of patches against frontend/lintian.
> I'm working on using a dependencies map to run the collection and check
> scripts as soon as possible, more on it soon.
> From: Raphael Geissert
> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 16:31:42 -0600
> Subject: [PATCH] Move
Hi,
Attached are a couple of patches against frontend/lintian.
I'm working on using a dependencies map to run the collection and check
scripts as soon as possible, more on it soon.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
lintian-overrides.mbox
Descripti
Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Thanks, applied with some changes to the long tag description and the
>> addition of the Severity/Certainty tags.
> Never heard about some good reason to duplicate the information (as what
> I understood from the new descriptio
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> writes:
>
>> Attached are the following two patches in a git-friendly mbox format:
>>
>>
lintian_enhanced_possibly-insecure-handling-of-tmp-files-in-maintainer-script.patch:
>> Requires the tmp dir name to have a name thus reducing the
Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Attached are the following two patches in a git-friendly mbox format:
>
> lintian_enhanced_possibly-insecure-handling-of-tmp-files-in-maintainer-script.patch:
> Requires the tmp dir name to have a name thus reducing the number of
> false positives and
Hi all,
Attached are the following two patches in a git-friendly mbox format:
lintian_enhanced_possibly-insecure-handling-of-tmp-files-in-maintainer-script.patch:
Requires the tmp dir name to have a name thus reducing the number of false
positives and allowing to check for = /tmp/foo thus also de
13 matches
Mail list logo
