Bug#649545: live-build: cannot create live usb-hdd because of mkdir: missing operand

2011-11-21 Thread Piotr
Package: live-build Version: 3.0~a38-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, I try to build wheezy usb-hdd using this config: # lb config -a i386 --mode debian --distribution wheezy --linux-flavours 686 -b usb-hdd --bootloader syslinux --memtest none -p xfce but I get this problem: Building d

[PATCH] Fix lb_binary_rootfs leaving the chroot without archives files.

2011-11-21 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
This seems like a copy-paste error introduced in 3ceb68b7d4eb5b28269c0780a808c3725c5f5668. --- scripts/build/lb_binary_rootfs |6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/build/lb_binary_rootfs b/scripts/build/lb_binary_rootfs index 96523a8..e0901a5 100755

Re: Using live-build and apt caching behind a proxy

2011-11-21 Thread Nick Bailey
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 03:31:28PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: > hi, > > Nick Bailey wrote (18 Nov 2011 16:11:27 GMT) : > > Hi, I'm trying to build a live hdd image for distribution on USB key > > with some of our software and an ability to install a debian system > > on the host machine. Unfortunatel

Re: Error generating Debian Live manual

2011-11-21 Thread Ben Armstrong
On 11/21/2011 09:14 AM, Bogdan Plevit wrote: > There are some errors in the Debian Live Manual build. These can be > checked in the build.log , http://live.debian.net/manual/build.log . > Because the build generates the manual, the manual is not available. We're aware, thanks. Please see prior

Error generating Debian Live manual

2011-11-21 Thread Bogdan Plevit
Hi, There are some errors in the Debian Live Manual build. These can be checked in the build.log , http://live.debian.net/manual/build.log . Because the build generates the manual, the manual is not available. Best Regards, Bogdan Plevit -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-live-requ...

Re: /lib/udev/path_id no more exists in udev 174

2011-11-21 Thread Baurzhan Muftakhidinov
Well, I see that Daniel already fixed this. Cool! On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Baurzhan Muftakhidinov wrote: > Got it. > Please check it > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 5:17 PM, intrigeri > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Baurzhan Muftakhidinov wrote (21 Nov 2011 10:50:19 GMT) : >>> Added simple check for

Re: /lib/udev/path_id no more exists in udev 174

2011-11-21 Thread Baurzhan Muftakhidinov
Got it. Please check it On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 5:17 PM, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > Baurzhan Muftakhidinov wrote (21 Nov 2011 10:50:19 GMT) : >> Added simple check for udev version, but not exactly the best coding >> style ;) > > Checking if /lib/udev/path_id exists would be quite more robust tha

Re: /lib/udev/path_id no more exists in udev 174

2011-11-21 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Baurzhan Muftakhidinov wrote (21 Nov 2011 10:50:19 GMT) : > Added simple check for udev version, but not exactly the best coding > style ;) Checking if /lib/udev/path_id exists would be quite more robust than a version check, don't you think? Other than this, PATH_ID should be spelled in low

Re: /lib/udev/path_id no more exists in udev 174

2011-11-21 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 11/21/2011 11:50 AM, Baurzhan Muftakhidinov wrote: > Added simple check for udev version, but not exactly the best coding style ;) rather than call udevadm and parse its output, it's simpler and faster to just check for the existence of path_id. i took the liberty to commit that to debian-next

Re: /lib/udev/path_id no more exists in udev 174

2011-11-21 Thread intrigeri
Daniel Baumann wrote (21 Nov 2011 10:31:02 GMT) : > even if it would be in testing, keep in mind that live-* always > supports the stable version it is intended to be used for (for > live-* 3.x that would be wheezy) *and* the previous one (for 3.x, > that's squeeze). It's obvious when I think of i

Re: /lib/udev/path_id no more exists in udev 174

2011-11-21 Thread Baurzhan Muftakhidinov
Hi, Added simple check for udev version, but not exactly the best coding style ;) On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 4:00 PM, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > Baurzhan Muftakhidinov wrote (21 Nov 2011 08:47:07 GMT) : >> I found this bug >> Please see the patch > > Thank you. > > Since udev >=174 is not in testing

Re: /lib/udev/path_id no more exists in udev 174

2011-11-21 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 11/21/2011 11:00 AM, intrigeri wrote: Since udev>=174 is not in testing yet, could you please submit a patch that supports both the "old" and the new udev toolkit? even if it would be in testing, keep in mind that live-* always supports the stable version it is intended to be used for (for

Re: /lib/udev/path_id no more exists in udev 174

2011-11-21 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Baurzhan Muftakhidinov wrote (21 Nov 2011 08:47:07 GMT) : > I found this bug > Please see the patch Thank you. Since udev >=174 is not in testing yet, could you please submit a patch that supports both the "old" and the new udev toolkit? Also, sending us the patch as an attachment would avo

Re: /lib/udev/path_id no more exists in udev 174

2011-11-21 Thread Baurzhan Muftakhidinov
Forgot to mention, this is related to live-boot On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Baurzhan Muftakhidinov wrote: > Hi there! > > I found this bug > Please see the patch > > > --- scripts/live.old    2011-11-21 14:41:10.0 +0600 > +++ scripts/live        2011-11-21 14:41:40.0 +0600 >