Greetings,
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:39 AM, carolus wrote:
> On 1/11/2012 2:44 PM, Richard Nelson wrote:
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:06 PM, carolus wrote:
>>>
>>> On 1/11/2012 12:09 PM, Richard Nelson wrote:
>>>
You might submit a wish-list bug
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If I cou
On 01/12/2012 07:36 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> I expect I'd find that useful. Updated patch follows.
applying (and uploading) later on, thanks, much appreciated.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 06:56:48PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 01/12/2012 06:14 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Echo_verbose "%s: Running %s" "$(date -R)" "${COMMAND} ${@}"
>
> this will produce rather longish-imho-not-eye-friendly messages in the
> style of
>
> Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:52:01 +010
On 01/12/2012 06:14 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> Sorry for the delay.
np.
> How about this?
very nice; except:
> Echo_verbose "%s: Running %s" "$(date -R)" "${COMMAND} ${@}"
this will produce rather longish-imho-not-eye-friendly messages in the
style of
Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:52:01 +0100 Running
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 01:39:44PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 06/10/2011 07:27 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> >For example, perhaps the lb wrapper script could (be configured to)
> >print the current time before starting a command?
>
> patch welcome :)
Sorry for the delay. How about this? You
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 655562 pending
Bug #655562 [live-build] scripts/build/lb_binary_syslinux is not defensive
enough against misconfiguration
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
655562: http://b
tag 655562 pending
thanks
On 01/12/2012 12:10 PM, Martin Quinson wrote:
> - the configuration must be checked at the beginning of the process (to
> ensure that typo such as hhd instead of hdd are detected and reported
> in a timely manned)
yep, like i said on irc.
also, it should be a warnin
Package: live-build
Thanks for the fish
(reposting this bug report because the first one seems to be lost in
ether -- sorry for potential dupplicates)
Falling in a recent bug of live-manual that advise the users to pass
usb-hdd as a build type is particularly unfriendly because the code on
its si
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 67 pending
Bug #67 [live-build] live-build: Please add armhf support
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
67: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tag 67 pending
thanks
On 01/12/2012 11:25 AM, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote:
> Please review my patch if it is good for inclusion.
i've left out the empty case and commit it, thanks.
- --
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-301
Package: live-build
Version: 3.0~a40-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
I'm working on installation Debian on Freescale QuickStart board.
And I found that armhf is still not supported by live-build.
* What exactly did you do (or not
11 matches
Mail list logo