Sorry about the present mess.
...and I am very glad!
On Friday 13 November 2015 08:27:23 Ben Armstrong wrote:
> So please, everyone who is anxious about what happens in the coming
> months, remain calm about this and let's not spread disinformation. If
> the Debian CD team succeeds in their efforts and produces a replacement
>
On 13/11/15 06:35 AM, Nick Bailey wrote:
> I only used debian-live once, and it worked perfectly for the purpose I
> needed. It's a shame when working code disappears to be replaced by an
> officially improved, unreliable, little-tested alternative.
I've seen a lot of misinformation swirling aro
I think we should use Daniel's forked version because we know it is a tried
and tested solution.
The timing of entire events is probably wrong, Debian management guys
should have waited for next version release before making drastic changes.
sent from Google Nexus device
On Nov 13, 2015 5:01 PM,
I whole-heartedly agree with Michael.
It all gives the impression that there is an emerging bourgeoisie who would
rather obstruct something than not control it. This concerns me, as a
righteous proletarian. I thought FOSS was all about working code, and
permitting other people to build on that
Hello all,
sorry to hear that debian-live has troubles, hopefully you will manage
to settle things up.
Many thanks for fixing the build, ill give it one more go. As i spend
almost week playing with debian live build and was not able to make
working setup for me (which may by my fault :-)
regards
On Nov 12, 2015 2:12 PM, Richard Nelson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Radovan Makovsky
wrote:
>> i tried several times to build netinst package through the web, but i
>> only get hybrid-iso packages. I'm not sure if it is bug or im doing
>> something wrong. When i build packages on my
