Years ago (not sure about current builds), I was in a similar situation
where my deployments had to remain offline and can highly recommend
apt-offline as an excellent solution to this problem. If I recall correctly
all that is required is a portable drive, python (any OS), and a reliable
connectio
It was possible and still should be. I used his setup a lot while teaching
a network program at a local college here covering both windows and linux
servers and desktops OS / config / etc, etc and it worked great! Ran dl
from ram with persistence only back to the hard drive (booting from usb
disk)
+1 Here Please!
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 11:27 PM chals wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 2:48 AM, Michael . wrote:
> > Good afternoon Neil McGovern.
> >
> > As a user of Debian and user of Debian Live I am personally contacting
> you
> > to express my disappointment over the issue named in the ti
I agree with the last few posts here it is a huge mess now and it is up to
Debian to continue this work and support our downstream efforts since they
have decided to do this to Daniel and our Debian-live efforts. As much as I
love and support Debian I am honestly not expecting that but this is now
Be sure to share Daniels story via social media using the buttons on his
blog. I hope it wakes up the entire community to what happens when you
actually do something right around here! https://t.co/NwWs9AfW87 Thanks,
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 2:15 PM Richard Newton wrote:
> I agree, shame on those
So sorry to hear this Daniel! I feel what they have done here is so wrong,
but I have noticed they are very totalitarian in their processes. To do
this to someone who has contributed so much though is really stupid on
their part! I will definitely be forking here as prior versions fit my
needs perf
I can not think of a worse way to go about doing this if your intent was a
collaboration with Debian-live! The only one here who has a right to any
hostility would be Daniel and others who have put a lot of effort into the
packages you freely admit you are building upon, instead of making
contribut
I have no idea what he said but it could be a bug depending on version,
using debian-next branch here building live jessie with user-setup and sudo
included in package list can not login as well... ran into this last night.
On Fri Jan 02 2015 at 1:36:15 PM chals wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 5
Hi,
I have been using the xtrlock package which allows the screen to still be
viewed while locked to good effect in classroom situations. It takes the
current users password by default. I may be missing something here but as
far as I am aware all current Debian screen locking mechanisms fill this
n
Wow that will be a major change! I will be testing live persistence here as
soon as it is available! Thanks to both of you for your hard work in all of
this!
On Tue Dec 09 2014 at 1:54:21 PM Daniel Baumann <
daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net> wrote:
> On 12/09/14 20:55, Ben Hutchings wrote
Absolutely! Thank You Thank You Thank You
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Richard Newton
wrote:
> Thank you and your employer!
>
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Daniel Baumann <
> daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net> wrote:
>
>> Thanks to my employer, I can spend quality time
fragmentation or an attribute is being added to the file at some point?
Suggestions appreciated.
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Ed Dixon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just posting this here in hopes of helping others. This may be old news to
> some,and the documentation has said this is possible
Hi,
Just posting this here in hopes of helping others. This may be old news to
some,and the documentation has said this is possible since the 2.X series
but I have never had any luck with it and others have asked about it in the
past as well. With the latest 4.X build I was successful in loading a
One word: *AWESOME!*
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Daniel Baumann <
daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net> wrote:
> I've uploaded live-* 4.0.0 yesterday concluding the main jessie cycle
> for debian-live. There will no doubtly be a few follow uploads with
> translation updates, dropping o
I just wanted to say congrats after a flawless build here from current
live-build from GIT! I love the python transition! That's what I call
progress!
WOW! Keep Rockin!
Same experience here (in fact this thread started almost exactly when I ran
into the first failed build due to this). Tried using the current git
debian-next branch as suggested. Many of the core *.bin and *.c32 files
seemed to be missing from the binary isolinux / syslinux folders. I tried
copyin
Hi,
I am sure this has come up but I have not found anything in the mailing
list regarding how to create a persistent store on a logical volume. Is it
possible? Efforts here have failed.
Thanks,
Hi,
First thanks all for your continued hard work on this project and the
great accomplishments you have achieved.
I was wondering if any one knows of a sane method of allowing control
of stacked file system layers after boot in Debian live. Similar to
what the docker project is doing but targeti
Because this thread mentions performance of persistence, I just tried full
persistence last night with " / union" in the persistence conf file and I
am definitely surprised to see how much slower (est. 5 to 10 times slower)
it is on my 2.0 USB thumbdrive than previous versions like squeeze. Is thi
http://www.otticarocchitellibusto.it/ure6sh.php
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-live-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51039aee.4255700a.29d9.4...@mx.google.com
It seems this was possible in versions past but the Xen info from the old
wiki is hopelessly out of date. Can some one put me on the right path to
getting a Debian Xen Dom0 live hypervisor or a Debian KVM live equivalent?
Thanks,
Thanks to chals explanation that a live-persistence.conf is required in the
root of the image file this has been resolved. I have tried to close the
bug report I opened by emailing 685270-d...@lists.debian.org.
I do feel that the live documentation needs work regarding this feature. As
it reads no
Resolved thanks to chals suggestion that
a properly formatted live-persistence.conf file be included file on the
root of the persistence image file system which is documented in man
live-persistence.conf.
I hope this helps clarify the process I used to try and create the live
system.
1. From a wheezy desktop create chroot image for sid.
2. Within Chrooted sid downloaded current git versions and build
live-build, live-config, and live-boot.
3. Install built live-build, live-config, and live-boot
Posting this to fill in the missing messages I just clicked on what keeping
the bug cc'd ment sorry.
retitle 685270: doesn't mount ext4 persistence file
thanks
On 08/19/2012 08:40 AM, Ed Dixon wrote:
> Built live from chrooted Sid and booted from disk with persistence file
in root
I will check the version of live-boot the system has build in it (made the
assumption that it would use the one on the building system). But as to the
rest yes.
I just filed a bug report on this issue having now confirmed it in both
wheezy and sid builds.
Package: live-boot
Version: 3.0~b1-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Built live from chrooted Sid and booted from disk with persistence file in root
as described in manual.
* What exactly
After rereading the post I noticed another mistake the mount brought about
by having a file named persistence should be /live/dev/sxxx not just
/dev/sxx. Sorry for any confusion that may bring.
Thanks,
Just noticed in the post that I mentioned file name persistent I also used
persistence as per the manual.
Hi,
Should the information provided here be useful please submit this as a bug.
I am no stranger to code but I am just getting to know GIT, the Debian bug
reporting process, and I am not sure that my setup reflects what is
expected to be testing against for bug reporting purposes. I am running
Deb
This is easy to say as I am not the one doing the work but, the snapshots
feature opens up worlds of possibilities and could definitely be useful in
the future. I think d-l is evolving so fast that no one has really
had time to explore that feature much yet, but I would hate to see us lose
it.
This may help, Daniel dropped a hint about using ext formatted files
as persistent storage in the 2.0 documentation and for me it has
worked like a charm. I can create an image file to use with
persistence on anything but NTFS so the 4G limitation applies but then
still browse to live image where o
Thank you! I am honored to have helped a little. I had assumed
everyone was getting this but me!
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Daniel Baumann
wrote:
> On 08/22/2011 06:10 PM, Ed Dixon wrote:
>>
>> I can't seem to create these files (config.conf and
>> boot.conf)
Hi,
I have been really looking over DL3 here and am just trying to
get my head around all the cool changes and I really like what I am
reading but, I can't seem to create these files (config.conf and
boot.conf) in a manor the system will accept. Are the commands coma
separated, line returned, do we
I am not sure but I think the Bug now exists in the Squeeze Repos?
P: Configuring file /etc/apt/sources.list
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
The following NEW packages will be installed:
apt-utils
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 271
Daniel and the rest of the crew,
I have been working with Debian live for a long time and absolutely
love it! I appreciate all the hard work, effort, and direction put
into it. I have created a variant based on Debian live that helps
teachers with a need for a portable network lab setup I call Edi
37 matches
Mail list logo
