Em 01/10/2016 08:58, "Daniel Pocock" escreveu:
>
> On 30/09/16 15:06, Rui Bernardo wrote:
> > On 30-09-2016 11:35, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >> On 29/09/16 23:03, Rui Bernardo wrote:
> >>> On 29-09-2016 18:53, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> I'm using live-build 4.0.3-1 on jessie to build the GnuP
te.
I would recommend an Ubuntu host and the live-build version 3.a~57
available in Ubuntu repositories. That's how I had success to build an
Ubuntu image without problems.
>
> On 08/08/2016 04:54 PM, Rui Miguel P. Bernardo wrote:
>>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> Em 08/08/2016 1
Hi John,
Em 08/08/2016 19:38, "John Lewis" escreveu:
>
> I verified that live-config was in ubuntu mode. This may be a bug.
What version of live-build are you using? I think live-build 4.x and more
recent versions do not support Ubuntu mode anymore.
>
>
> On 08/08/2016 02:11 PM, John Lewis wrot
Clonezilla can do that very easy and compressed, and create a hybrid iso of
the cloned system.
Em 24/04/2016 17:50, "Melanie" escreveu:
> David, If I clone the server with dd is there a way to create an
> installable ISO from the binary image?
>
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 12:43 PM, David Chris
Dear maintainers,
I'm just reporting that, somehow, live-build version in Jessie
repository is version 4.0.3-1 (released 25 October 2014), and not the
latest live-build 4.x version 4.0.5-1, that was released 7 February
2015.
I've searched snapshots.debian.org website to find when the regression
h
qu...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: https://lists.debian.org/548734bd.9090...@progress-technologies.net
>
From 74b3f4a003488e4514f43d05cdda85aa596faca9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From
> tags 772522 patch
>
> Patch attached, build against debian-next, please test it ;)
>
>
> On 08/12/2014 04:38, Rui Miguel P. Bernardo wrote:
>> Package: live-build
>> Version: 4.0.3-1
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> Dear Maintainer,
>>
>> * W
Package: live-build
Version: 4.0.3-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
I wanted to build a live image based on Ubuntu 14.10 utopic using
latest live-build.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
I have created a
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:38 PM, Richard Nelson wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 6:04 AM, Rui Miguel P. Bernardo
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Richard Nelson wrote:
>> > Greetings,
>> >
>> > On Thu,
ission on the idea, so here is
> what I think appears to be the last patch submitted
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-live/2012/06/msg00237.html
>
> Thanks.
>
>> Thanks.
>
>
Hi,
sorry for this late reply. Appended to this email is an updated patch
for live-build 4.0.3-1.
Package: live-build
Version: 3.0_a53-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
the losetup-lukshome hook was removed from live-build recently because
it was broken since the recent live-boot changes.
I have corrected this and now the hook works in squeeze/wheezy/sid and
should work wit
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 6:09 AM, Ramu Sethu wrote:
> Again same error. Used sid snapshots of live-debian.net repository. Updated
> my packages. Rebuilt the binary image after cleaning.
I think it snapshots packages in live.debian.net may not be the latest
live-build version. The last live-build pa
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 02:49:42PM +0530, Ramu Sethu wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I some how built the ISO image using wheezy snapshot of live.debian.net in
> squeeze host system.
>
> The built image (burnt in USB) is not loaded when i select "live" in the boot
> options. It throws some Xorg error in glib
e (it wasn't in the
previous patches).
TODO:
* "mute" wgets;
* update man pages;
* clean code (variables and function names, messages, etc)
I'm not happy with the functions and their names. I created them while I
was creating the patch. They surely need some rework to m
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 3:29 AM, Daniel Baumann
wrote:
> On 06/28/2012 02:22 AM, Rui Miguel P. Bernardo wrote:
>> I tried to apply all that in the patch.
>
> good, so we're entirely on the same page, great.
>
>> Because daily installer builds are not in snapshots
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 08:48:44PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 06/27/2012 08:04 PM, Rui Miguel P. Bernardo wrote:
> > Following today irc talk here is a fresh patch against debian-next.
>
> thanks.
>
> > This removes the debian-snapshots mode and uses only sta
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 06:15:19PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 06/18/2012 03:08 PM, Rui Miguel P. Bernardo wrote:
> > I'm _proposing_ this patch to support snapshots.debian.org in live-build.
>
> good idea, thanks for comming up with it. i'm right now a bit busy, s
a live-build --mode option, it may not be
best or desired approach, considering that it makes using backports with
snapshots impossible. Nevertheless I think this patch could be a good
starting point to the final patch.
Sorry for this long email.
Cheers
Rui Miguel P. Bernardo (1):
support snaps
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 08:28:07PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 06/09/2012 08:10 PM, Paul Seelig wrote:
> > i'd rather prefer to see all the shortcomings of the
> > live-installer be fixed, in order to be able to get rid of my own hacks.
>
> we do so too, and patches are welcome.
I don't kno
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 11:36:15AM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 06/07/2012 01:29 PM, upite...@lycos.com wrote:
> > Is it a better "non persistent" solution if I create an iso hybrid
> > instead of usb-hdd (hdd) image?
>
> as long as you do not manually enable persistency, there is no
> persis
I can confirm this.
live-build should not leave an empty fstab behind because it breaks
live-installer (and live-boot/config?) if it does. live-installer will
not create a new fstab
if one, even empty, exists. This breaks multi-partition disk
installations and even in "all in one partition" the sw
>> I'm going to let this settle for now and export http_proxy every time I use
>> live-build. Or maybe I'll change for squid. I'll return into this if I
>> get problems
>> with a not standard debian build.
>
> see the comments from the last couple of commits on debian-next, you
> don't need to do t
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Daniel Baumann
wrote:
> On 05/31/2012 11:49 AM, Rui Miguel P. Bernardo wrote:
>> apt-cacher users don't have http_proxy in their environment and it
>> doesnt work for them.
>
> so what do they have then?
I meant that I don't hav
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Daniel Baumann
wrote:
> On 05/30/2012 09:44 PM, Rui Miguel P. Bernardo wrote:
>> I've installed squid proxy here and tested the latest lb_config changes
>> again.
>> Indeed, it works out-of-the-box with squid, IIF you have http_proxy set
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Daniel Baumann
wrote:
> On 05/28/2012 09:12 PM, Rui Miguel P. Bernardo wrote:
>> Yes, we need to use those variables you have set in lb_config in
>> lb_bootstrap_debootstrap and lb_binary_debian-installer. With the vars
>> set by lb_config
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Daniel Baumann
wrote:
> On 05/28/2012 07:28 PM, Rui Miguel P. Bernardo wrote:
>> That's why I've put these lines in lb_bootstrap_debootstrap
>>
>>
>> + export http_proxy="${PREVIOUS_PROXY_ENV}"
>>
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Daniel Baumann
wrote:
> On 05/28/2012 03:47 PM, Rui Miguel P. Bernardo wrote:
>> proxy is used in chroot;
>
> for every Chroot(); call, the environment inside the chroot is cleared
> and stuff like http_proxy gets set. once Chroot(); termina
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Daniel Baumann
wrote:
> On 05/28/2012 10:24 AM, intrigeri wrote:
>> I'm unsure about exporting http_proxy at the configure and
>> deconfigure step. Might it not taint the build environment on exit?
>
> yep.
>
>> Perhaps just passing http_proxy to the debootstrap i
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 6:30 AM, Daniel Baumann
wrote:
> On 05/16/2012 08:45 AM, Rui Miguel P. Bernardo wrote:
>> The website is still under development but the live image is fully
>> working and the workflow is consolidated, but still not documented,
>> just in the source c
Hi everyone,
the following two patches will make live-build use LB_APT_HTTP_PROXY in
debootstrap and also to download the d-i udebs. This can save something
between 5 to 10 minutes in download time each build.
Because I only use apt-cacher-ng I did not tested this with any other
proxy installed,
this
live image. Suggestions are welcome.
Rui Miguel P. Bernardo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-live-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CAP1Yx5zzivd+GRsSV9zi4YjY94tfqOHV
Line 256 in /usr/share/live/build/package-lists/rescue list
#enif
should be
#endif
Edit the file manually as a workaround. It's a bug in latest change in
that file.
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Rui Miguel P. Bernardo
wrote:
> Your config works if not using the rescue list, the
Your config works if not using the rescue list, the problem must be
something in the rescue list.
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Rui Miguel P. Bernardo
wrote:
> I tried your config here, also with latest version, and I can confirm
> the error happens here also.
>
> For clarity th
bian.net --backports false
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Ellwood Blues wrote:
> 2012/5/14 Rui Miguel P. Bernardo :
>> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Rui Miguel P. Bernardo
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Ellwood Blues
>>> wrote:
>>>&
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Rui Miguel P. Bernardo
wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Ellwood Blues wrote:
>> 2012/5/14 Rui Miguel P. Bernardo :
>>> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Ellwood Blues
>>> wrote:
>>>> Sorry. I've j
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Ellwood Blues wrote:
> 2012/5/14 Rui Miguel P. Bernardo :
>> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Ellwood Blues wrote:
>>> Sorry. I've just realised that I didn't reply to the list.
>>>
>>> Here it is a
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Ellwood Blues wrote:
> Sorry. I've just realised that I didn't reply to the list.
>
> Here it is again:
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Ellwood Blues
> Date: 2012/5/13
> Subject: Re: Any Idea?
> To: &
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Ellwood Blues wrote:
> lb build stops with this:
>
>
> P: Begin queueing installation of package lists (install pass)...
> E: Nesting conditionals is not supported
> P: Begin unmounting filesystems...
> P: Saving caches...
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Miguel Villanueva Lobato
wrote:
> I mean a file with an ext2 file system I have created with:
> $ dd if=/dev/null of=live-rw bs=1GB seek=1 # for a 100MB sized image file
> $/sbin/mkfs.ext2 -F live-rw
>
> Because I was trying it with files instead of partitions.
I
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Miguel Villanueva Lobato
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've tried this creating an ISO image of a directory containing the live
> debian system image and other image labeled live-rw (with an ext2 fs), and
> then, using this ISO for the CD/DVD device in VirtualBox, but it does
Hi Piotr,
you have to set "--debian-installer-distribution daily", else the
stable (squeeze) installer is selected.
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 3:00 AM, upite...@lycos.com wrote:
> hi
>
> There is a problem with debian-installer on live wheezy hdd, starting
> installer I get this message:
>
>>>Live
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Jeronimo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am newbie in Debian live and I can't fin config/package-lists file. I only
> have config config/chroot_local-packageslists and
> config/binary_local-packageslists.
>
> Manual only says to:
>
> echo virtualbox-ose-guest-x11 >> config/pac
>
> HOWEVER, when I add my own hook
> to "chroot/lib/live/config" it doesn't seem to run... FURTHER, when I add
> a
> line to an existing "hook" residing in that folder, it doesn't run either.
> Do
> I need to run a "lb config" to get the hooks to propagate?
Hi David, maybe it's a cache problem.
Using the following live-build hook stops the original starpar error.
cat config/chroot_local-hooks/99-fix-grep-v-live-config-sysv-rc
#!/bin/sh
# fix bug in live-config
sed -i '/grep/ s|$| \|\| true|' /lib/live/config/01?-sysv-rc
A patch to live-config that applies this solution:
>F
Please accept the following patch to lukshome hook. Makes the hook
more flexible by allowing the user to specify another partition label
and/or filename of the encrypted file.
Changes:
* Added new lukspart boot option to specify a partition label other
than 'lukshome'.
* Added new luksfile boot op
45 matches
Mail list logo
