Re: Supporting armel/armhf in wheezy-lts

2016-04-18 Thread Guido Günther
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:44:43AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Guido Günther wrote: > > I assume the level of sponsorship offered is reasonable to support an > > arm port? > > Yes, I believe so. They will join as gold sponsor. > > > I still wonder how we could wo

Re: Supporting armel/armhf in wheezy-lts

2016-04-18 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 18.04.2016 um 08:45 schrieb Guido Günther: [...] > I'm all for it (although it's easy to say for me since the most burden > will probably be on the kernel team) and having it as experimental with > a single sponsor seems sensible. +1 from my side too. I guess I'm one of those armel hobbyists an

Re: Supporting armel/armhf in wheezy-lts

2016-04-18 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Guido Günther wrote: > I assume the level of sponsorship offered is reasonable to support an > arm port? Yes, I believe so. They will join as gold sponsor. > I still wonder how we could would make it simpler to have this > support end up at the right places (i.e. LTS get

Re: Supporting armel/armhf in wheezy-lts

2016-04-18 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello, On Fri, 15 Apr 2016, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > armhf users to run jessie and armel users to be only hobbyists). But here > we have a sponsor willing to sign on a contract saying us « our customers wish > to use Debian 7 OS continuously so that we are planning to sponsor the LTS > efforts for