Re: wheezy eglibc packages to test

2016-05-27 Thread Guido Günther
Hi, On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 12:16:07AM +0200, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: > Hi, > > I've prepared a eglibc package for wheezy, available at > > deb https://people.debian.org/~santiago/debian santiago-wheezy/ > deb-src https://people.debian.org/~santiago/debian santiago-wheezy/ > >

Re: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Enigmail in Wheezy-LTS

2016-05-27 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Hi Guido-- On Fri 2016-05-27 07:16:40 -0400, Guido Günther wrote: > I'm currently looking into updating Icedove in Wheezy-LTS to the esr > version 45[1]. thanks for your work on this! > Since Enigmail is a often used extension I wanted to update this to a > compatible version as well (as was

Enigmail in Wheezy-LTS

2016-05-27 Thread Guido Günther
Dear enigmail maintainers, I'm currently looking into updating Icedove in Wheezy-LTS to the esr version 45[1]. Since Enigmail is a often used extension I wanted to update this to a compatible version as well (as was done with prior ESR releases). Looking at 1.9 in sid it requires gnupg2. I justed

Re: Debian LTS Security update of ruby-activerecord-3.2

2016-05-27 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi Guido Regarding this question: > Does it make sense to add this as an autopkgtest? Well we could do that, but I do not think it is worth the effort for a wheezy security update. In stretch (rails package, where I got the patch from) and later there is already a good unit test suite where

Re: Debian LTS Security update of ruby-activerecord-3.2

2016-05-27 Thread Guido Günther
Hi Ola, On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:27:42PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > Hi ruby-activerecord-3.2 maintainer(s) and Debian LTS team > > This is my third package contribution to Debian LTS. I'm doing this as a > training exercise and this is why the maintainer have not been asked to > this for me.

Re: About the security issues affecting ruby-rest-client in Wheezy

2016-05-27 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi Raphael Thanks for the clarification. I see now that it was quite clear from the description. I got the impression that this script should be used later in the process too. I now see that it is not the case. Thanks again. / Ola Sent from a phone On Thu, 26 May 2016, Ola Lundqvist wrote: >

Re: About the security issues affecting ruby-rest-client in Wheezy

2016-05-27 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Thu, 26 May 2016, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > Hello dear maintainer(s), > > The Debian LTS team recently reviewed the security issue(s) affecting your > package in Wheezy: > https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-1820 Hello Ola, I'm not sure if you got the process right here.

Re: Iceweasel 45 for Wheezy-LTS

2016-05-27 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 08:59:53AM +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > Hi Mike, > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:29:22PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 07:34:29PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > > > Hi Mike, > > > I'm currently looking into building icedove 45 for Wheezy-LTS. I wonder >

Re: Iceweasel 45 for Wheezy-LTS

2016-05-27 Thread Guido Günther
Hi Mike, On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:29:22PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 07:34:29PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > I'm currently looking into building icedove 45 for Wheezy-LTS. I wonder > > if I should do the same for Iceweasel or if you intend to keep > >