On 2017-10-24 15:44:18, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After further analysis for the issues affecting golang in Wheezy, I have
> concluded that it is not necessary to perform updates.
>
> CVE-2017-15041 concerns only the "go get" command, and only malicious
> Subversion repositories which can *t
Somehow the DLA-1130-1 that was associated with this upload never made
it to the mailing list archive here:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/10/
I also didn't receive a copy, so I suspect it was never sent.
A.
PS: I realized this while reviewing my own announcements - it seems
Hi Antoine, Brian,
> Somehow the DLA-1130-1 that was associated with this upload never made
> it to the mailing list archive here:
>
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/10/
>
> I also didn't receive a copy, so I suspect it was never sent.
>
> A.
>
> PS: I realized this while re
Dear maintainer(s),
The Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are
currently open in the Wheezy version of puppet:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/puppet
Would you like to take care of this yourself?
If yes, please follow the workflow we have defi
Dear maintainer(s),
The Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are
currently open in the Wheezy version of spip:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/spip
Would you like to take care of this yourself?
If yes, please follow the workflow we have defined
Dear maintainer(s),
The Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are
currently open in the Wheezy version of suricata:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/suricata
Would you like to take care of this yourself?
If yes, please follow the workflow we have
On 2017-10-27 19:05:07, Hugo Lefeuvre wrote:
> Hi Antoine, Brian,
>
>> Somehow the DLA-1130-1 that was associated with this upload never made
>> it to the mailing list archive here:
>>
>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/10/
>>
>> I also didn't receive a copy, so I suspect it was
Antoine Beaupré writes:
> Somehow the DLA-1130-1 that was associated with this upload never made
> it to the mailing list archive here:
Yes, I commented on that in a recent email.
I didn't realize until after I uploaded the newer version associated
with DLA-1140-1. So I tried sending DLA-1130-1
