Accepted wpa 2.3-1+deb8u8 (source amd64) into oldoldstable

2019-07-31 Thread Mike Gabriel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 22:44:37 +0200 Source: wpa Binary: hostapd wpagui wpasupplicant wpasupplicant-udeb Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.3-1+deb8u8 Distribution: jessie-security Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian wpasupplicant

[SECURITY] [DLA 1867-1] wpa security update

2019-07-31 Thread Mike Gabriel
Package: wpa Version: 2.3-1+deb8u8 CVE ID : CVE-2019-9495 CVE-2019-9497 CVE-2019-9498 CVE-2019-9499 CVE-2019-11555 Debian Bug : 927463 Several vulnerabilities were discovered in WPA supplicant / hostapd. Some of them could only partially be

[SECURITY] [DLA 1866-1] glib2.0 security update

2019-07-31 Thread Mike Gabriel
Package: glib2.0 Version: 2.42.1-1+deb8u2 CVE ID : CVE-2018-16428 CVE-2018-16429 CVE-2019-13012 Debian Bug : 931234 Various minor issues have been addressed in the GLib library. GLib is a useful general-purpose C library used by projects such as GTK+, GIMP, and GNOME.

Accepted glib2.0 2.42.1-1+deb8u2 (source all amd64) into oldoldstable

2019-07-31 Thread Mike Gabriel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 21:33:27 +0200 Source: glib2.0 Binary: libglib2.0-0 libglib2.0-tests libglib2.0-udeb libglib2.0-bin libglib2.0-dev libglib2.0-0-dbg libglib2.0-data libglib2.0-doc libgio-fam libglib2.0-0-refdbg Architecture:

Re: firefox-esr 60.8.0esr-1 still missing for jessie

2019-07-31 Thread Sylvain Beucler
Hi, (taking upon myself to answer since nobody else did) On 29/07/2019 20:12, Hoshi Hoshimoto wrote: > firefox-esr 60.8.0esr-1 is still missing for jessie-security. > > Is there a special reason behind this, or is this just an oversight? > > Thanks for looking into this. > > References: >

Re: firefox-esr 60.8.0esr-1 still missing for jessie

2019-07-31 Thread Sylvain Beucler
Hi, (taking upon myself to answer since nobody else did) On 29/07/2019 20:12, Hoshi Hoshimoto wrote: > firefox-esr 60.8.0esr-1 is still missing for jessie-security. > > Is there a special reason behind this, or is this just an oversight? > > Thanks for looking into this. > > References: >