Re: ruby-mini-magick

2019-10-02 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hello Brian, On 25 Sep 2019 16:42:39, Brian May wrote: > Hello All, > > I just noticed I can't build ruby-mini-magick in Jessie, > required for a security update. > > expected no Exception, got # -quiet -ping /tmp/mini_magick20190925-3686-3v99mo.psd") failed: > {:status_code=>1, :output=>""}>

[SECURITY] [DLA 1943-1] jackson-databind security update

2019-10-02 Thread Markus Koschany
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Package: jackson-databind Version: 2.4.2-2+deb8u9 CVE ID : CVE-2019-14540 CVE-2019-16335 CVE-2019-16942 CVE-2019-16943 Debian Bug : 940498 941530 More deserialization flaws were discovered in

Accepted jackson-databind 2.4.2-2+deb8u9 (source all) into oldoldstable

2019-10-02 Thread Markus Koschany
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2019 21:36:21 +0200 Source: jackson-databind Binary: libjackson2-databind-java libjackson2-databind-java-doc Architecture: source all Version: 2.4.2-2+deb8u9 Distribution: jessie-security Urgency: high Maintainer:

Re: ClamAV update in jessie

2019-10-02 Thread Hugo Lefeuvre
Hi Holger, > > This work has already been done for stretch, so we should be able to > > backport it to jessie. Still, I'm going to spend quite some time on it... > > what does 'some time' mean? in general, this seems reasonable to me. The debdiffs are fairly simple, and the versions are close.

Re: ClamAV update in jessie

2019-10-02 Thread Holger Levsen
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 07:16:10PM +0200, Hugo Lefeuvre wrote: > This work has already been done for stretch, so we should be able to > backport it to jessie. Still, I'm going to spend quite some time on it... what does 'some time' mean? in general, this seems reasonable to me. -- cheers,

ClamAV update in jessie

2019-10-02 Thread Hugo Lefeuvre
Hi, I've spent a couple of hours working on ClamAV since yesterday. I have backported Sebastian Andrzej Siewior's work to jessie, and tested it. Fine so far, this fixes a couple of issues including the Zip bomb ones. Problem: we're backporting 0.101.4 to jessie. This implies an ABI bump and

Re: [SECURITY] [DLA 1942-1] phpbb3 security update

2019-10-02 Thread Sylvain Beucler
Hi Mike, On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 02:01:25PM +, Mike Gabriel wrote: > On Di 01 Okt 2019 13:32:25 CEST, Sylvain Beucler wrote: > > I see you reverted affectation for CVE-2019-13376. > > > > CVE-2019-13376 is an follow-up fix to CVE-2019-16993 (2016) which I > > registered just yesterday

Re: [SECURITY] [DLA 1942-1] phpbb3 security update

2019-10-02 Thread Mike Gabriel
Hi Sylvain, On Di 01 Okt 2019 13:32:25 CEST, Sylvain Beucler wrote: Hi Gabriel, I see you reverted affectation for CVE-2019-13376. CVE-2019-13376 is an follow-up fix to CVE-2019-16993 (2016) which I registered just yesterday toclarify that we've been missing this earlier fix (AFAICS

Re: Introduction

2019-10-02 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Urkarsh, On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 06:35:29AM +0530, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Hey, I joined back in July as a trainee and now a part of the LTS team > since this October, and all this while I forgot to introduce myself, so > here it goes.. I am 19 y/o Debian Maintainer (opening a NM process for >

September LTS Report

2019-10-02 Thread Hugo Lefeuvre
Hi, Here is my LTS report for September 2019. I was allocated 23.75h. Unfortunately I did not manage to spend any of them. Last month was very busy on the personal side, and I had to temporarily pause my Debian involvement. Everything should be back to normal now, and I expect to be able to

Re: Introduction

2019-10-02 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Utkarsh, > Apart from open source, my interests lies in Parsers, Compilers, > and Computer Architecture. Though I haven't gotten much there, > but I hope I soon will (still figuring out how to go about it). Ah, I immediately think of my university days and the "Dragon Book"… Welcome to the